Categories: Individual Protection| Insurance| Insurance
Tags:Fortis life uk
Fortis UK has announced its protection operation made “good progress” last year and also revealed its proposed new name, Ageas.
The provider's life arm (which deals exclusively with protection products) new business premiums (APE) grew to £15m in 2009 from £3m in 2008 as it continued to roll-out its range across the market.
It is set to announce a link-up with broker Clarkson Hill in the near future as its expansion continues.
Fortis Life UK also reported an increase in market share to 4.3% by Q4 among IFAs, who make up about half the protection sales sector. Sales from this part of the business, which launched in July 2008, now account for 1% of Fortis' total revenue.
The group's non-life business made a record level of gross written premiums (GWP) which increased by 6% to £805m from £760m in 2008. However, profits before tax and interest dipped sharply to £29m from £76m.
Its name change has become necessary after the separation of the group's banking assets, which will be taken up by BNP Paribas who owns the "Fortis" name. The proposal will be put before shareholders at the insurer's AGM in next month.
| Comment | Fortis UK to rebrand as Ageas; Protection sales outperform |
Related articles
From Cover
Categories
Tags
Comments
Related articles
Most Read
Ensure you never miss another story by following IFAonline regularly updated news feed on Twitter.
Events
Poll
|
|
Related Information
Job search
Adviser Careers will open the right investment career path for you. Search hundreds of vacancies on www.advisercareers.com now
In Focus
The “Structured Products” industry has come a long way over the last few years and in my opinion has evolved, and not devolved itself, alongside the more traditional investment markets.
Viewpoints
Susan Barclay, head of marketing at Scottish Provident, explains why it can be advantageous to divide a client’s protection outlay between different products and how the task can be greatly facilitated by using menu-based format .
What a stupid name
I wonder which idiot came up with the name and then the ridiculous explanation of how they got there. It has to be the best example of really bad branding.
Posted by: Pete Smeet