Behind the ETF curtain

Author: Paul Burgin
ETFM | 02 Sep 2011 | 16:19

Categories: ETFs

Topics: ETF| ETFM sector analysis| Deutsche Bank| Vanguard| FSA| UCITS

behind-etf-curtain

The barrage of regulator reports and comments on ETFs has brought to light some of the activities inside ETFs, securities lending is one of these. Paul Burgin asks asset managers what they think of the practice

Deutsche Bank’s July Industry Perspective highlighted the importance of securities lending within the ETF industry. While the practice can generate attractive revenues to offset total expense ratios (TERs), it is not without its risks. ETF providers are not the only parties debating whether the practice is right or wrong. Nor are they the only parties making use of stock lending.


Stock lending is nothing new. Mutual funds and pension providers have lent out stock for many years, generating returns that add to profits, reduce overall investment costs or boost fund performance. Not all active managers indulge in lending. Skandia, Jupiter and Standard Life Investments do not lend stock but have no specific policies about it or about investing in ETFs that lend out underlying assets.


Few advisers have specific policies barring investment in stock lending products. Martin Bamford, managing director of Informed Choice, has a typical attitude towards it. He says: “I have not got too many concerns about stock lending, assuming it is within reasonable limits and properly disclosed. Used well, it can generate revenue which can reduce the cost of funds.”


His key concern is a ‘perfect storm’ where stock is not returned and the collateral put up against the stock turns out to be toxic. Although possible, Bamford believes the chances of it happening are slim. “In practice, it is very unlikely that ETF providers would ever find themselves in this position and the benefits of stock lending probably outweigh any disadvantages,” he says.


Steven Keshishoghli of Fund Intelligence, a discretionary manager, also cites return of collateral as a key issue. Advisers and clients of his firm are warned that offshore domiciled ETFs may not by covered by consumer protection schemes in the event of a product failure.


Keshishoghli is also surprised about the general lack of awareness and concern in the advisory sector. He recently attended a meeting with a leading absolute return fund manager who invests in ETF Securities physical gold product. He says: “Although ETFS does not lend out its gold, we asked the manager about it in order to test his level of knowledge. Other advisers in the room were not even aware of the issue. I would have thought professionals would be asking more questions.”

Page 1 of 4

More from etfm

Related briefings

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

  • Comments
  • Print
  • RSS
  • Share
blog comments powered by Disqus

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2012

View all the winners here

This year we celebrate the fifth annual PPR Structured Product Awards. The 13 awards are divided into two, covering the products delivered to market over the past year and the support services that are also essential to the market. All the awards are designed to highlight not just the winners but the strengths and capabilities of the range of providers in this highly innovative market.

Events

event logo

The British Mortgage Awards 2013

04 Jul 2013 - 04 Jul 2013

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage & Protection Senate

12 Sep 2013 - 13 Sep 2013

London, UK

event logo

Cover Protection and Health Forum 2013

03 Oct 2013 - 03 Oct 2013

London, UK

Markets

Sponsored video

Poll

Is Hector Sants right to think his tenure as FSA chief executive was a success?