Comments

A Tax Too Far

The spectre of raising CGT back 40% or even higher must be the best "two step shuffle" since the equally devious reduction in PEP/TESSA/ISA allowances a few years ago. Indexation of gains, R.I.P. Here's a solution, get rid of 25% of all MP's, change the DB pensions of all Govt and LA employees to a DC scheme like the rest of us mere mortals and abolish the £64k loss of office payments for MP's.

Posted by: Anonymous

11 Mar 2010 | 09:34
Complain about this comment

Wild Guess

The truth is that Mark of L&G and presumably their PR department to show what a bunch of on the ball blokes are engaging in wild guess at what will be in the budget..(as they did in pre budget report and were wrong). The truth is that few know, and even if they do know at this stage track record of government & civil servants at budget time is that the budget box gets change with hours to go. Last CGT change and IHT change Darling & co didn't even bother to tell his own tax offices and made them look daft. For what it's worth I think they could well hammer CGT, but since only 200,000 people a year pay and I understand it close to £1 for every £1 collected apart from politik it won't raise the money. Tempting to attack the CGT allowance, RIP 'closing the savings gap' which is what got us into this mess.

Posted by: PI1010

11 Mar 2010 | 11:52
Complain about this comment

CGT and IHT likely targets in Budget 2010 - L&G

Add a new comment:

Poll

Should there be a cap on hourly fees?

New look Professional Adviser

Coffee Lounge