As part of a new, regular feature cutting to the core of some of the industry's key developments, IFAonline takes a quick look at accredited bodies...
Accredited bodies will help the Financial Services Authority (FSA) maintain high standards for the industry in the areas of qualifications, ethics, and Continuing Professional Development (CPD).
They will check advisers qualifications and CPD, but their role has nothing to do with the actual advice given by firms, which remains the firm's responsibility.
Once an accredited body is satisfied an individual has met the required standards set by Retail Distribution Review (RDR), it will issue him or her with a Statement of Professional Standing (SPS). *Remember* Advisers do not have to be a member of an accredited body in order to receive their SPS.
Finally, any trade/professional body or association has been invited to apply for accredited body status. Today, the FSA awarded six organisations provisional 'accredited' status, subject to final acceptance later this year.
A little over two years ago, the FSA was planning to set up a professional standards board (PSB), independent of the regulator, to oversee and maintain standards across the industry.
The FSA eventually decided against this, choosing instead to keep this as part of its key responsibilities, with the help of accredited bodies.
Good question, even if we do say so ourselves. The FSA's professionalism rules, which accredited bodies will effectively police alongside the FSA, do not come in until 1 January 2013.
However, the vast majority of the RDR's requirements must be put in place by firms BY THAT DATE, including having an SPS.
The FSA is expected to confirm final acceptance to accredited body applicants later this year, but a number of bodies have already begun checking advisers qualifications and CPD records.
SPSs are the 'property' of accredited bodies. This means they have the power to remove an adviser's statement if it considers they are failing to meet the required competence and ethics standards. Should this happen to you, you must tell your regulated firm that you no longer have an SPS.
Accredited bodies will carry out a 'random' 10% CPD sample check (the body can exceed this requirement if they choose). *Remember* After 2012, advisers will be required to carry out a minimum 35 hours CPD. At least 21 hours of this must be structured and 'outcomes-focused'.
| Share | |
| Comment | What, why and when? A quick look at accredited bodies |
More regulation news
Email alerts
Recommended reading
Categories
Topics
Comments
Related articles
Most Read
This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.
Events
Poll
|
|
Job search
Ifaonlinejobs will open the right investment career path for you. Search hundreds of vacancies on www.ifaonlinejobs.co.uk now
In Focus
Two months left before the ‘real RDR deadline’ – are you compliant with the required professional...
Viewpoints
2012 marks a watershed for the Life companies, fund managers, banks and advisers who service...
Ethics perverted
@Scott Sinclair - You need to go off and do some more homework mate as whilst the FSA's rules say that you do not have to be a member of an accredited body in order to receive their SPS, as far as I am aware, there is not one that has not done an FSA/EU and made it super equivelent i.e. you cannot get an SPS signed by them UNLESS YOU AEW A MEMBER. This is complusory membership through the back door. This is unethical and possibley illegal. We could have a situation where an adviser is approved by teh FSA and complies with eberything the FSA requires except they refuse to be subject to a code of ethics that they disagree with. The wording I use below, were I still a member of an accredietd body, is sufficient to have my right to earn a living removed, whislt still being an approved person under the FSAs rules. You can pay good money to a professional for their services in much of europe (I was on excercise in Germany in the 1980s with the Amry) for actions in the UK which would be illegal in the UK. By using those services of a professional, the UK accredited bodies could state that the individual using them, whilst NOT having committed a criminal act in the country concerend, had potentially brought the accredited body in to disrepute by it's actions and be refused an SPS which would then mean they would loose the right to work in their profession as although they'd remain an approved person as they had not breached the FSAs approved persons regime, they were unable to obtain an SPS. I hasten to add that whilst I know of those who did make use of those professional services whilst on excercise, I did not. Not that I object or have anything against that profession as I think they have many satisfied customers.
Posted by: Phil Castle