RDR gap fill test: Understanding the main investment theories

Author: IFAonline
IFAonline | 07 Jul 2011 | 10:31

Categories: Investing in the profession

Topics: RDR| CPD| FSA| AIC| CII

cpd-logo-113x130-jpg

Congratulations, reader, for completing our RDR gap fill article on the main investment theories.

For this to qualify as structured learning, and to confirm that you have read and understood the learning outcomes in the article, you must pass a short test.

TAKE THE TEST HERE

Once you have done this, you will be able to download a certificate to present to your accredited body.

Your accredited body will be responsible for checking you are compliant to continue practising from 1 January 2013, when the RDR comes into force.

This will include checking you have a relevant QCF Level 4 qualification or have filled any knowledge 'gaps' between now and 31 December 2012.

The article you have just read covers the learning outcome:

Demonstrate an understanding of the merits and limitations of the main investment theories

  • Chartered Insurance Institute gaps covered: 35-40
  • Institute of Financial Planning gaps covered: 103-113

Professional Adviser recommends you take the time to read the article properly - utlising where necessary material from the recommended reading list put together by author Jackie Lockie (see below) - before attempting the test.

The test below contains ten multiple-choice questions related entirely to the article. You must answer all ten to pass and claim your certificate.

You will be given two attempts to answer any one question correctly. You will also be given two more opportunities to go back in and correct your mistakes should you fail to pass the test.

TAKE THE TEST HERE

*Jackie Lockie's recommended reading list

Books:

  • The Four Pillars of Investing, William Bernstein
  • Random Walk Theory: A Random Walk Down Wall Street, Burton G. Malkiel
  • Arbitrage Pricing Theory by Ross (1976)
  • The Investment Answer, Daniel C. Goldie and Gordon S. Murray
  • The wisdom of crowds, James Surowiecki
  • Investment Strategies for the 21st Century, Frank Armstrong (free downloadable book)

 

Papers:

  • Multi-factor investing, Eugene F. Fama, Dimensional Funds Advisors
  • Explaining stock returns, A Literature Survey, James L Davis,
  • Kahneman and Tversky (1979) Prospect Theory

 

Further learning and articles:

  • Articles are too numerous to list them all but a notably good one is 18 April 2011 - Investment Adviser article by Samuel Lee, Morningstar - Index turnover costs puts trackers at a disadvantage.
  • Risk gets riskier: Bill Sharpe is worried about what's being done with his famous ratio - October 2002 Institutional Investor article by Hal Lux.
  • Want to know more about futures and CFDs? See the Chartered Institute of Securities and Investment www.cisi.org for courses and material on the subject.

Want to learn more about investment theories? The AIC is launching an adviser site with an online webinar on this subject in September 2011. Contact eventsteam@theaic.co.uk to reserve a place and more information on dates for this and other related courses.

More investing in the profession news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

There are no comments submitted yet. Do you have an interesting opinion? Then be the first to post a comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Should there be a cap on hourly fees?

In Focus

Viewpoints