F&C queries Reit rules and suitability

Author: By Jonathan Boyd
IFAonline | 01 Jun 2006 | 14:00

Categories: Investment

Topics: Parliament| finance act

house-3

With Parliament about to debate rules governing real estate investment trusts (Reits) as part of the Finance Act 2006, F&C has issued a call to include further rule changes to ensure a wider spread of Reit vehicles.

Current proposals mean establishing a Reits market presence is really only open to already existing, larger property companies with large shareholder bases.

Paul Herrington, head of UK property investment at F&C, says the rules mean new entrants will find it hard to establish themselves, bearing in mind conversion costs, gearing restrictions and the requirement for income distribution.

Together, the rules would make it difficult for Aim-listed property companies to convert - as Aim is not a recognised market for purposes of the legislation - while existing property unit trusts would find it impossible to convert, as would limited partnership structures.

The latter is a point echoed by others in the industry, such as Michael Patrick, business development director at Legal & General Property.

He too has highlighed the issue of what to do about rules restricting conversion of unit trusts, including the 10% shareholder limit rule, which effectively stops institutions from acquiring more than 10% in a Reit.

This would make it difficult for totally new vehicles to establish themselves in the market, as they would likely have to seek funding through an IPO, while limiting the amount that could be sold to any one institutional investor.

Herrington says on this point that not only would such a vehicle not be able to acquire Reit status until after it had floated, but it would not even be able to acquire property until it had gone through these hoops.

"If UK legislators do not widen Reits investment criteria then investors will have to consider other property investment options, particularly if they want to track the direct property market as closely as possible. Reits may therefore appeal to some investors but not necessarily to all,” Herrington says.

Patrick has said that if the relevant legislation is not put in place, then unit trust managers may well think it not worth their while trying to convert, especially where the government fails to implement some sort of “grandfathering” to enable shareholders with greater than 10% holdings in such vehicles to not suffer a tax disadvantage as the rules currently would apply if conversion were to proceed.

If you have any comments you would like to add to this story or would like to speak to its author about a similar subject, telephone Jonathan Boyd on 020 7484 9769 or email jonathan.boyd@incisivemedia.com.

IFAonline

More investment news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

There are no comments submitted yet. Do you have an interesting opinion? Then be the first to post a comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Are you more likely to use a Structured Product for:

In Focus

Viewpoints