FSA fines broker for self-cert failings

Author: By Jamie Obertelli
IFAonline | 30 Jan 2009 | 12:40

Categories: Mortgages| Self-employed

dollar-bundles-small-jpg

The FSA has fined Nottingham mortgage broking firm Gillen Farrelly Independent Advisers £17,500 for failing to ensure it provided suitable advice which exposed over 80 customers to the risk of being sold an unsuitable self-certified mortgage.

The case arose from a number of visits to the firm, including one in August 2007 which was part of an FSA thematic project looking at the sale of self-certified mortgages.

The regulator said that between January 2006 and April 2008 the firm failed to make appropriate enquiries about customers' income, expenditure, credit history and debt position, so that it could properly assess the affordability of its recommendations. The FSA also revealed that Gillen Farrelly Independent Advisers failed to record sufficient personal and financial information about customers to demonstrate the suitability and reasons for its recommendations, while not conducting adequate due diligence in respect of a third party introducer.

Georgina Philippou, head of retail enforcement at the FSA, said brokers advising on mortgages needed to give suitable advice to ensure that customers are not unduly exposed to financial hardship in the future. She explained: "This is especially important in firms like Gillen Farrelly who advise customers who might be consolidating debts or have adverse credit histories and where affordability is an important consideration."

In setting the penalty the regulator said it had taken into account the fact that Gillen Farrelly voluntarily engaged a firm of external compliance consultants to conduct a compliance audit in May 2008, had terminated its arrangements with the introducer and has not accepted any referrals of mortgages from the introducer since November 2007.

The firm no longer sells self certification mortgages and has agreed to undertake a customer contact and remediation exercise. Gillen Farrelly also agreed to settle at an early stage of the FSA's investigation. Because of these factors, the firm qualified for a 30% reduction in penalty. The FSA said that it would have otherwise imposed a financial penalty of £25,000.

IFAonline

More mortgages news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

There are no comments submitted yet. Do you have an interesting opinion? Then be the first to post a comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Do you believe lenders should cut rates?

In Focus

Viewpoints