Categories: Mortgages| Sub-prime
Tags:Compliance| Fine
Brokers are being urged to heed the FSA’s recent enforcement actions and ensure they meet regulatory requirements.
Despite numerous actions and warning by the FSA in recent months, compliance specialist MS2M says many advisers are still failing to ensure they have good record keeping.
In recent weeks, four advisers have been banned, while many more have been fined, including a huge £900,000 fine for Thinc Group for failing to document sub-prime cases properly.
Julie Alderson, director of MS2M, comments: “Given the FSA’s stance, it’s a great opportunity for responsible advisers to go back to basics in terms of the management of their firms and to revisit their core practices.
“The risks are too high to ignore putting fundamental systems and processes in place.”
Margaret Cole, director of enforcement at the FSA, has already warned the regulator will pursue personal fines against individuals managing firms that fail to implement proper controls, and recent fines have been made for this reason.
Alderson says expensive consultancy fees or monthly retainers are not the only way to ensure a firm is meeting its compliance requirements. She says compliance health checks can cost a few hundred pounds and will indicate where firms are achieving compliance and where they are failing, so suitable action can be taken to keep the regulator at bay.
If you would like to comment on this story, contact:
John Bakie
Tel: 020 7484 9805
e-mail: John.Bakie@incisivemedia.com
| Comment | Brokers urged to review compliance in light of fines |
Related articles
From IFAonline
Categories
Tags
Comments
Related articles
Most Read
Ensure you never miss another story by following IFAonline regularly updated news feed on Twitter.
Events
Poll
|
|
Related Information
Job search
Adviser Careers will open the right investment career path for you. Search hundreds of vacancies on www.advisercareers.com now
In Focus
What is absolute return investing? Investors are increasingly looking for investments that aim to deliver an absolute return to use as a core part of a diversified portfolio. This demand for absolute performance contrasts with traditional managed funds which often aim to outperform a peer group or index. A traditional managed fund could deliver outstanding performance in relation to the other funds in its sector or peer group but still generate a capital loss for investors.
Viewpoints
With the debate surrounding funding long term care in the run up to the last general election, few areas have been as topical or well publicized.
There are no comments submitted yet. Do you have an interesting opinion? Then be the first to post a comment