Categories: Personal Accounts| Better Business
Topics: personal accounts| pensions|
Auto-enrolment could lead to 200,000 job losses at smaller firms as labour costs will increase by around 2%, academic research predicts.
From 2012 workers will be auto-enrolled into a qualifying work place pension, or the personal accounts scheme, unless they opt-out.
Pension Commission, and later the department for work and pensions, research estimated labour costs of 0.6% for all firms, and 1.1% for the smallest firms.
However, a study from the University of Warwick’s Institute for Employment Research said the figure would stand at 2% when administration, target market salary levels and predicted take-up rates are taken into account.
Author Bernard Casey surveyed small employers and questioned them on the possible effects of a 2% hike in labour costs – without mentioning auto-enrolment or personal accounts.
Many businesses said they would do nothing at all, but face substantial competition, while others said they would pass costs on to their customers.
Casey said the higher costs associated with auto-enrolment “might well weaken them and lead to business failures and redundancies”.
B&CE Benefit Schemes deputy chief executive John Jory said pressure will be more on costs rather than jobs.
He said: “There are a lot of companies that do not currently make contributions for a big chunk of their workforce. For those companies it will increase costs and they are going to have to deal with those increased costs.
“But it is part of the remuneration package for their employees. You can not just cut jobs and hope to still meet your out put requirements.”
Jory also said leveling down could come as a result of cost pressures.
“My biggest concern is as employers look to balance the books they will see leveling down as the easiest way to cut costs.”
The department for work and pensions said “reports like this distort the debate”.
A spokesman said auto-enrolment and personal accounts would help millions of people save for later life – many for the first time, including those in small businesses.
He said: “In a society where people can now expect to spend up to a third of their lives in retirement, increasing opportunities to save for later life is essential.”
He added balancing the needs of workers while minimising burdens on employers, had been a guiding principle in the development of the reforms.
“The personal accounts scheme itself will be simple, low cost and easy for any employer to use.
Stakeholder engagement continues, including with organisations that represent small businesses, on the draft regulations.
“Consultation on the first set of draft regulations recently closed and DWP are now carefully considering all responses to ensure that the regulations minimise burden on employers and create the best possible combination of arrangements and time limits to deliver simple, standard and effective arrangements for automatic enrolment.”
| Share | |
| Comment | Auto-enrolment to hit 200,000 jobs |
More personal accounts news
Email alerts
Recommended reading
Categories
Topics
Comments
KISS Pesonal Accounts Goodbye
Keep it simple stupid (KISS) all that was ever needed with group schemes was to make joining the employer's pension scheme, whetehr that be a PPP, stakeholder or Occupational scheme entry by default, i.e. you had to opt rather than opt in, but allow staff a window of say 2years to change their mind and have theri contributions back. Simple and straightforward and wouldn't have required all this expensive consultants and quangos to re-invent the wheel!
Posted by: Phil Castle
Mr
What's the worst that could happen? How about a fine of up to £50,000 and possible imprisonment for employers who wilfully fails to comply... This is already on the statute books in the form of section 35 of the Pensions Act 2008. And Draft Regualations are already out there to designate enforcement powers...
Posted by: Jamie Clark
Correction
Sorry, that should be section 45 of the Pensions Act 2008, obviously - duh!
Posted by: Jamie Clark
You heard it from me first.
For heavens sake anyone who has read anything I have said on the topic since it was first introduced will know this is EXACTLY what I have been saying all along. No - I'm no genius - just old enough to remember SET and know that Personal Accounts are nothing more than an employment tax. But look on the bright side. Employers will not be able to recommend that employees opt out – so they will have to pay us to do so.
Posted by: Harry Katz
Related articles
Most Read
This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.
Events
Poll
|
|
Job search
Ifaonlinejobs will open the right investment career path for you. Search hundreds of vacancies on www.ifaonlinejobs.co.uk now
In Focus
Transferring clients’ assets between organisations can be a major headache – often time...
Viewpoints
At the start of one of busiest times of year it is easy to think about all the obvious things...
Auto-enrolment
If Firms do not comply, what is the WORST THAT CAN HAPPEN? I.e, what is THE PENALTY and HOW WILL IT BE ENFORCED? If your report is true, I as a Firm's financial adviser will be counseeling my client Firms to ignore the legislation because, as with so many of Gordon's laws, the cost of compliance usually exceeds the cost of suffering the consequences of non-compliance.
Posted by: Peter Morris