Categories: Individual Protection| Protection| Underwriting
Topics: protection| CBK| | Peter Chadborn| Morgan Ash
An influential protection IFA says he is willing to take a commission hit by using only those insurers offering ‘Big T’ tele-underwriting.
Peter Chadborn, co-founder of CBK Colchester, says other systems of underwriting are time consuming and offer too large a non-disclosure and compliance risk, adding he even prefers paper-based applications.
Big T tele-underwriting enables advisers to separate themselves from the interview and medical aspects of a protection application by passing these responsibilities on to an insurer or third party.
It is, however, only offered by some insurers while most have spent millions installing systems enabling advisers and consumers to apply online. Online systems can, for the simplest cases, place an applicant on-risk within half an hour.
But Chadborn says online applications "only add another tier of potential human error". He says, from now on, once CBK has formulated a shortlist of providers offering appropriate policies for his client, the ultimate decision will rest on which one offers Big T.
"Big T is perfect because it properly separates the advice and application process," he says. "The quicker insurers adopt it, the better. I'll get murdered for saying this but I would happily take less commission in exchange for Big T; that is how passionately I feel about it."
Providers charge more for offering Big T processes because they take on the administration costs and liability risks.
Tele-interviewing provider Morgan Ash says more advisers, and even some networks, are using providers because of their Big T capabilities.
"Advisers are looking to give advice and submit the case and, with Big T, there is less work, less liability and a lower risk of non-disclosure," managing director Andrew Gething says.
"It is difficult to understand why more providers don't offer it when you examine the cost-benefit analysis. But then a number of advisers like the online application process."
Alan Lakey, partner at Highclere Financial Services, says: "I do like Big T because it takes me right out of the FOS [ombudsman] loop, but it is not the be all and end all. There can be complications. For example, if a client is declined or rated, I might not know why and have to go back to them. Whichever [underwriting] route you take, there is a downside."
Tele-underwriting is not a new concept and has been utilised in the US for many years. But there are different types.
| Share | |
| Comment | Leading protection IFA ditches online applications |
More individual protection news
Email alerts
Recommended reading
Categories
Topics
Comments
Chartered Financial Planner
I fully agree with Peter. The online application process for many firms is very time consuming and the slight extra commission does not cover the additional cost. Paper applications/data capture forms are inclreasinlgy complex and provide ample opportunity for confusion and non disclosure.
Posted by: Bob Perry
Related articles
Most Read
This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.
Events
Poll
|
|
Job search
Ifaonlinejobs will open the right investment career path for you. Search hundreds of vacancies on www.ifaonlinejobs.co.uk now
In Focus
Transferring clients’ assets between organisations can be a major headache – often time...
Viewpoints
Here at Zurich, we know you have a choice as to where you place your protection business...
Senior Partner
Having just submitted a case to the FOS on behalf a client whose husband died, and was declined a payment upon the claim made on the level term assurance policy arranged by an intermediary using the Friends Provident teleunderwriting service, due to non marterial disclosure, resulting from a slap dash approach adopted by the intermediary, I fully concur with Peter Chadborn.
Posted by: K. S. Barrett