FOS upholds third of complaints against providers

Author: Scott Sinclair
IFAonline | 15 Sep 2009 | 10:20

Categories: Protection| Better Business

judgment-scales-2-big

A third of complaints against the major UK insurers were found in favour of the consumer, half the number upheld against banks, figures from the financial ombudsman (FOS) show.

According to data for the first six months of 2009, upheld complaints against the likes of Aviva, Axa, L&G and Friends Provident fell around the 30% mark.

Axa Insurance received the most complaints (513), according to the FOS, which is today naming and shaming the worst complaints offenders for the first time.

Four in ten of these cases were found in favour of the consumer but Phoenix Life, the next biggest complaint recipient, was deemed not to have a case to answer on two-thirds of complaints.

The FOS upheld 49% of the 164 complaints it received about Windsor Life, but only 27% of 254 cases were upheld against Scottish Widows.

Elsewhere, 31% of cases against L&G Assurance and Friends Provident Life & Pensions were upheld.

Not only did banks receive the vast majority of the complaints, but the percentage of upheld cases was also high.

In the case of Capital One Bank, 91% of 1,744 complaints were upheld, while 81% of almost 7,000 complaints against Lloyds TSB Bank were found in favour of the consumer.
Lloyds and its subsidiaries accounted for more than 15,233 complaints, more than a fifth of the total received by the FOS.

Seven in ten complaints were upheld against Barclays and The Royal Bank of Scotland, while figures of 67%, 66% and 63% relate to Abbey National, Alliance & Leicester and MBNA Europe. Six out of ten cases were upheld against NatWest and HSBC.

 

More protection news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

FOS upholds 30% of complaints against providers

Having submitted a number of complaints against product providers - it is interesting that the Financial Pmbudsman DOES NOT INVESTIGATE - which means the figures provided by the FOS are flawed. By removing complaints in this way - the figures are massaged ( like the school children who need "special needs " ) reckless manipulation of the FIGURES BY THE FOS are fundamentally flawed, innaccurate and are a disservice to those poor people who have been tricked into purchasing faulty goods and services, reckless racketeering by Directors - the use of words like " missselling " of endowments, pensions etc., when the reality is the Fiancnial Institutions faield to look after customers - or their life savings - whilst pocketing large bonuses for their DECEIT AND DISHONESTY. WHy should consumers TRUST a Bank or an INSURANCE COMPANY ?

Posted by: Ian Lees

14 Sep 2010 | 16:12
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

fund5live

21 Feb 2012 - 29 Feb 2012

London, UK

event logo

COVER Breakfast Briefing: Cash Plans

27 Mar 2012 - 27 Mar 2012

London, UK

event logo

Buy to Let Market Forum

17 Apr 2012 - 18 Apr 2012

London, UK

Poll

Should there be a cap on hourly fees?

In Focus

Viewpoints