UBS employee banned and fined £35,000

Author: Laura Miller
IFAonline | 13 Nov 2009 | 12:06

Categories: Regulation

Topics: FSA| margaret cole| UBS

ubs-pa-6901653

The FSA has fined and banned a former UBS employee for helping cover-up unauthorised trading losses.

Andrew Cumming, a former client adviser at the London branch of UBS, must pay £35,000 and is not allowed to act in any regulated capacity for a minimum of five years on the grounds he is not ‘fit and proper'.

UBS was hit with an £8m fine from the FSA earlier this month for systems and controls failings which failed to prevent the fraudulent activity.

Cumming's signature appears on paperwork which helped document fake loans to conceal losses arising from unauthorised trading.

Affected customers were told their funds were providing loans to other UBS customers with promises of high rates of interest.

To make these ‘loans' appear official, documents on UBS headed paper were sent to customers stating the ‘loans' were guaranteed by the firm.

The FSA's investigation concluded Cumming, who worked in UBS's international wealth management business, signed these documents on seven occasions between October 2005 and October 2007, after a senior colleague ask him to do so, despite knowing the ‘loans' were bogus.

By late 2007, Cumming was fully aware the ‘loans' were part of a scam to conceal losses from unauthorised transactions, but he failed to escalate this knowledge.

Instead, he signed a further ‘loan' allowing the deception to continue.

Margaret Cole, FSA director of enforcement and financial crime, says:"Cumming deliberately misled UBS and its customers. Although he did not stand to make a personal gain, his complicity allowed a colleague to continue making unauthorised trades, while the losses continued to mount up.

"We are committed to deterring behaviour of this kind by banning and fining anyone found to have committed such misconduct."

In setting the financial penalty, the FSA agreed Cumming did not initiate the circumstances leading to his misconduct, nor did he conduct any of the unauthorised transactions.

Cummings also qualified for a 30% cut on his financial penalty for agreeing to settle at an early stage of the FSA's investigation.

Serious financial hardship entitled Cummings to a further discount.

If it wasn't for the settlement discount and Cumming's hardship, the FSA would have imposed a financial penalty of £100,000.

 

More regulation news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

There are no comments submitted yet. Do you have an interesting opinion? Then be the first to post a comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

fund5live

21 Feb 2012 - 29 Feb 2012

London, UK

event logo

COVER Breakfast Briefing: Cash Plans

27 Mar 2012 - 27 Mar 2012

London, UK

event logo

Buy to Let Market Forum

17 Apr 2012 - 18 Apr 2012

London, UK

Poll

Should there be a cap on hourly fees?

In Focus

Viewpoints