Buy-to-let market sees signs of recovery: Moneyfacts

Author: Stephen Quigley
IFAonline | 16 Nov 2009 | 15:12

Categories: Products

Topics: | lenders| landlords

copenhagen-row-of-buildings-reflected-in-canal

The buy-to-let market has begun to show signs of recovery with the number of deals increasing from the all time low of 179 in September 2009 to 239 today.

The sector has been one of the biggest casualties of the last two years, with 93% of all deals disappearing in that time. There were 3,662 buy-to-let products available in August 2007.

There are now only four available deals with a 20% deposit, despite deals which required just a 10% or 15% deposit making up 64.8% of the market just over two years ago.

Michelle Slade, spokesperson for Moneyfacts, said it is harder than ever for landlords to find a competitive mortgage because numerous lenders have pulled out of the sector and remaining lenders have restricted their deals.

She added: "Buy-to-let lenders have continued to tighten criteria, restricting the size of portfolios that landlords can have, both in number of properties and the maximum total advance."

 

More products news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

There are no comments submitted yet. Do you have an interesting opinion? Then be the first to post a comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

fund5live

21 Feb 2012 - 29 Feb 2012

London, UK

event logo

COVER Breakfast Briefing: Cash Plans

27 Mar 2012 - 27 Mar 2012

London, UK

event logo

Buy to Let Market Forum

17 Apr 2012 - 18 Apr 2012

London, UK

Poll

Should there be a cap on hourly fees?

In Focus

Viewpoints