Financial services is UK's biggest loser to fraud

Author: Laura Miller
IFAonline| 22 Jan 2010 | 15:40

Categories: Industry

Tags:fraud| Bradford & Bingley| Chelsea| mortgage fraud

540b0d6e-e718-4ed3-8180-54f34f19589e

Financial services loses more to fraud each year than any other private sector industry in the UK, according to the National Fraud Authority (NFA).

Fraud costs the financial services industry £3.8bn a year, the NFA figures estimate, accounting for almost half of all the £9.3bn private sector fraud.

In insurance, fraud cost the industry £2.08bn during 2008, though these losses only apply to the general insurance market as undetected fraud in long-term insurance is believed to be very low, the NFA data suggests.

However, the ABI believes the industry may have lost a further £1.9bn in undetected fraud during 2008, up 24% since 2006.

In the mortgage sector the NFA found a culture of underreporting losses, with lenders suggesting mortgage fraud losses during 2008 amounted to about £150m despite several high profile cases which point to a much higher figure.

Last March, Bradford & Bingley reported a £40m mortgage fraud and set aside £270.8m to cover potential losses from fraud and professional negligence.

Similarly, Chelsea Building Society reported in August 2009 they had identified fraud of up to £41m.

Despite confirmed mortgage fraud losses for these two lenders alone exceeding £80m, both lenders account for only 4.8% of all mortgage lending during 2008.

Mortgage fraud losses during 2008 are likely to be much higher than the fraud losses provided to the NFA in February 2009.

Industry experts, including the Council of Mortgage Lenders, put the real figure of mortgage fraud at closer to £1bn, according to the NFA.

In 2009, KPMG reported fraud cases worth over £1.1bn came to UK courts in 2008, the highest level recorded since 1995.

 

Related articles

From IFAonline

Categories

Tags

Comments

Paranoia

As I have said elsewhere these figures need to be put into the perspective of the sheer size of the total market. If that is done they actually indicate that fraud is relatively small in comparison. This doesn't mean we ignore it, merely that it is not a panic levels - remember that one man, Bernard Madoff, managed to make a lot more than this. And fraudsters will always be with us. If, on the other hand, people do believe that these figures are too high then they should ask why they are so high after 25yrs of Regulation. At no point does anyone question the role and competence of the FSA in all this. I would suggest that the annual cost of compliance in this country is in the order to £2bn - so industry is losing as much through regulation as by fraud - and there is absolutely no evidence that the fraud figure would be any different if the current regulatory regime did not exist. There is NO evidence.

Posted by: Glen McKeown

24 Jan 2010 | 10:45
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

Tweet dreams are made of this

Follow IFAonline on Twitter

Tweet dreams are made of this

Ensure you never miss another story by following IFAonline regularly updated news feed on Twitter.

Events

event logo

Legal and General Mortgage Market Roadshow

15 Sep 2010 - 15 Sep 2010

London, UK

event logo

Cover Protection and Health Insurance Forum 2010

07 Oct 2010 - 07 Oct 2010

London, UK

event logo

Cover Excellence Awards

07 Oct 2010 - 07 Oct 2010

London, UK

Poll

How long do you expect the coalition Tory/Lib Dem government to last?

Advertisement

In Focus

Viewpoints

Advertisement