McPhail fears Treasury to target basic pension allowance

Author: John Bakie
IFAonline | 08 Feb 2010 | 15:10

Categories: Pensions - Retail

Topics: Hargreaves Lansdown| Tax relief| Tom McPhail

in-text-20131

The basic pension contribution allowance could be the next target in the Government’s plans to cut pension relief, according to Tom McPhail.

Hargreaves Lansdown head of pensions research says the tax loophole is an obvious target for a Government looking to raise income.

Currently, those who do not pay tax can make a contribution of up to £2,880 a year and receive tax relief on it, grossing the money up to £3,600.

However, the loophole is often used by the wealthy, who give money to a spouse or child who can then make a pension contribution and receive an additional £720. McPhail believes this loophole could soon be closed.

"We have got a situation right now where the Government has no money to fund its projects, and they will be on the lookout for loopholes like this," he says.

Because the exemption is mainly used by the wealthy and their close relatives, the removal of the basic pension contribution allowance is unlikely to be noticed by the majority of voters, and could even be seen as further taxation of the rich.

"What worries me is that any changes to basic pension contribution allowance send out the wrong message on pension saving yet again," McPhail adds.

"It would send out a message that long-term saving is not a priority for the Treasury, at a time when we should be encouraging people to save for the future."

More pensions - retail news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

No fears on this one

It does indeed seem strnage that this basic pension allowance was ever created i.e. for non income earners. With the draconian treatment of accumulated pension funds i.e. removal of ability to pass pension funds to children's pensions on second death, it is already highly questionable as to whether ot makes sense to lock monies into pension funds with ONLY 20% tax relief. Probably better to sacrifice tax relief and have a fund that is the investors ALWAYS - be it ISA or unit trust or OEIC. Rumours come and go on whether the tax-free cash facility is under threat, so if arranging such investments for children to their now 55th birthday as a minimum,whta hope might THEY ever have of getting tax free cash?

Posted by: Andrew Barnes

08 Feb 2010 | 16:28
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Have you seen a decline in demand for SIPPs as a result of the proposed erosion on pension tax relief for those earning £150,000 or more?

In Focus

Viewpoints