Categories: Pensions - Retail
Topics: Hargreaves Lansdown| Tax relief| Tom McPhail
The basic pension contribution allowance could be the next target in the Government’s plans to cut pension relief, according to Tom McPhail.
Hargreaves Lansdown head of pensions research says the tax loophole is an obvious target for a Government looking to raise income.
Currently, those who do not pay tax can make a contribution of up to £2,880 a year and receive tax relief on it, grossing the money up to £3,600.
However, the loophole is often used by the wealthy, who give money to a spouse or child who can then make a pension contribution and receive an additional £720. McPhail believes this loophole could soon be closed.
"We have got a situation right now where the Government has no money to fund its projects, and they will be on the lookout for loopholes like this," he says.
Because the exemption is mainly used by the wealthy and their close relatives, the removal of the basic pension contribution allowance is unlikely to be noticed by the majority of voters, and could even be seen as further taxation of the rich.
"What worries me is that any changes to basic pension contribution allowance send out the wrong message on pension saving yet again," McPhail adds.
"It would send out a message that long-term saving is not a priority for the Treasury, at a time when we should be encouraging people to save for the future."
| Share | |
| Comment | McPhail fears Treasury to target basic pension allowance |
More pensions - retail news
Email alerts
Recommended reading
Categories
Topics
Comments
Related articles
Most Read
This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.
Events
Poll
|
|
Job search
Ifaonlinejobs will open the right investment career path for you. Search hundreds of vacancies on www.ifaonlinejobs.co.uk now
In Focus
We all want certainty – and when it comes to auto-enrolment, advisers and their corporate...
Viewpoints
Clients now have a growing need for choice, flexibility and transparency when it comes to...
No fears on this one
It does indeed seem strnage that this basic pension allowance was ever created i.e. for non income earners. With the draconian treatment of accumulated pension funds i.e. removal of ability to pass pension funds to children's pensions on second death, it is already highly questionable as to whether ot makes sense to lock monies into pension funds with ONLY 20% tax relief. Probably better to sacrifice tax relief and have a fund that is the investors ALWAYS - be it ISA or unit trust or OEIC. Rumours come and go on whether the tax-free cash facility is under threat, so if arranging such investments for children to their now 55th birthday as a minimum,whta hope might THEY ever have of getting tax free cash?
Posted by: Andrew Barnes