Warning on SIPP and SSAS property rules

Author: John Bakie
IFAonline | 22 Feb 2010 | 15:15

Categories: SIPPs

Topics: Hornbuckle Mitchell| residential property| SIPP

Jigsaw puzzle of a house

SIPP and SSAS clients may need to re-examine any loans secured against taxable property following a clamp-down by HMRC.

The change in tax rules means loans from pension funds secured against residential property will now be seen as an ‘unauthorised payment' and face a tax charge.

Mary Stewart, marketing director of Hornbuckle Mitchell, says the change in rules is the next stage in HMRC's crackdown on residential property holdings within SIPP and SSAS.

New HMRC regulations treat a scheme as having an interest in taxable property if it ‘holds the property or any estate, interest, right or power over the property'.

Previously, the taxman did not consider property as security on a pension loan as ‘having an interest'.

However, under the new rules acquiring an interest in taxable property means a pension scheme is treated as having made an unauthorised payment.

Initially, the value of the payment would be related to the relatively low fees involved, meaning any charge would be minimal.

However, if the loan were to default and the scheme enforced a charge, then this would lead to additional interests in the property. This would generate unauthorised payment charges based on the value of the property, which could be substantial.

Hornbuckle Mitchell says the changes mean residential property and tangible moveable property are no longer suitable security for pension scheme loans, which could limit the options available to some clients.

"HMRC is cutting back on the ways you can get exposure to residential property through a SIPP or SSAS," says Stewart.

"This will not be an issue for most clients, but if an adviser believes there could be taxable property exposure in their clients' pensions then they should take action as soon as possible."

More sipps news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

HMRC are disgusting

Thanks to Mr Boom & Bust. That's all I have to say

Posted by: Incompetent Regulators Awards Team

22 Feb 2010 | 16:19
Complain about this comment

Freedom??

I think this is a direct result of the failing of Freedom SIPP. The loans for French properties were secured against a member's residential address in the UK.

Posted by: Here

25 Feb 2010 | 16:50
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

fund5live

21 Feb 2012 - 29 Feb 2012

London, UK

event logo

COVER Breakfast Briefing: Cash Plans

27 Mar 2012 - 27 Mar 2012

London, UK

event logo

Buy to Let Market Forum

17 Apr 2012 - 18 Apr 2012

London, UK

Poll

Should there be a cap on hourly fees?

In Focus

Viewpoints