Categories: Individual Protection
Topics: ABI| Peter Chadborn| Nick Kirwan| Income Protection
The ABI is considering proposing a protection scheme in which moderate-to-high earners are "encouraged" to buy their own protection rather than rely on state support.
The embryo idea, which the ABI says could be delivered via the Government in a similar way to NEST, would see households earning over £25,000, for example, incentivised to protect themselves.
ABI assistant director of health and protection Nick Kirwan says the money saved would be used to better protect low earners.
A NEST-style scheme of auto-enrolment for protection is also being considered, though all its ideas are "a long way off being ABI policy", Kirwan says.
The ABI says the scheme would consider state support sufficient for a household income of about £25,000.
But it argues in households with greater incomes - in which people are generally considered to have borrowed more - there is a "huge gap" between essential income needed and the amount available through state support.
"The higher up the income scale, the bigger the gap between state benefit and the income needed to survive," Kirwan says.
"This latter group could be encouraged to take out individual protection, as essentially the system is not working for them anyway."
He adds: "Whichever party wins the next election there will be a period of financial pressure for the country, but if we could help build up a more resilient society with more savings and more protection we could focus scarce resources on those who need it most."
But protection specialist IFA Peter Chadborn warns a model in which people on a certain income get state provision while the rest get private cover is "dangerous" and "raises the word 'exclusion'".
"It is dangerous to suggest anyone below a certain income will receive provision from the state, for example sick pay, which is comparable to individual income protection," he says.
"There is greater danger in people relying on state provision benefits and finding them wanting than in relying on income protection."
But he says he would welcome an "across the board" auto-enrolment NEST-style scheme based around employment.
"If you are changing employer it probably comes with a change of lifestyle and so is a good opportunity to review financial planning needs," he says.
| Share | |
| Comment | ABI mulls national protection plan |
More individual protection news
Email alerts
Recommended reading
Categories
Topics
Comments
Polarisation?
Surely as a society we should be encouraging responsibility and self-help? State support was originally intended for those whose impoverished circumstances made it impossible for them to survive. Today it seems that everybody, including the family mutt, is eligible for some handout or the other. There will always be unfortunates who should be assisted but if we discourage consumers from any form of self-reliance by promising that the state will help then we are deceiving oursellves as individuals and as a society.
Posted by: Alan Lakey
Am I hearing this right?
Are the ABI saying that because I earn a decent income I should buy my own insurance protection while, at the same time, I continue to pay National Insurance contributions to provide this, not just for me, and I will not be able to claim if I have cover, but for the workshy, in addition to the unfortunate. Sounds very Lewis Carroll to me.
Posted by: Mike Hillier
Related articles
Most Read
This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.
Events
Poll
|
|
Job search
Ifaonlinejobs will open the right investment career path for you. Search hundreds of vacancies on www.ifaonlinejobs.co.uk now
In Focus
Two months left before the ‘real RDR deadline’ – are you compliant with the required professional...
Viewpoints
Here at Zurich, we know you have a choice as to where you place your protection business...
protection
Before any plans are considered the benefit system has to be completely re-jigged. The current benefits system has evolved rather than been properly structured. Therefore ABI's statement re earning over £25,000 when single mother's whose twin babies were born a couple of months early can get £400 per week makes a mockery of stating the better off to be earning over £25000. Once someone earning over £25000 is actually better off then other plans can be implemented not before.
Posted by: Joanne Adrain