Investment fund advertising is as bad as promoting cigarettes or alcohol and should either be banned or accompanied by a health warning, Succession Advisory Services’ Simon Chamberlain says.
The CEO of the business consultancy, which last year unveiled its Investment Matrix to provide its members' investment solutions, says there are still too many advisers selecting funds and picking stocks in a bid to meet their clients' financial goals.
Chamberlain says fund advertising regularly quotes past performance and can send a misleading message to consumers.
"They are the equivalent of tobacco adverts," he says. "They should read: 'this could kill' [your investment] and be banned in the same way cigarette advertising has been. They can both induce unnatural behaviours."
Succession, launched in April last year to help advisers grow and improve their businesses, today added wealth managers Quilter and Vestra Wealth to its investment solutions platform.
Quilter has launched five model investment portfolios - cautious, distribution, income, growth and adventurous - for Succession partners' clients while Vestra will also offer a range of five risk-graded portfolios specifically aligned to the company's Investment Matrix.
Jupiter, F&C Investments and SWIP (multi-manager), Tactica and Schroders (multi-asset active), 7IM and Frontier (multi-asset passive) and Dimensional (asset class strategies) already provide portfolio solutions to Succession's partner firms.
Investment director Andrew Smith says diversification offers the most likely route to achieving clients' objectives.
"It has been proven the majority of fund managers fail to produce a return for their investors over the index when you take into account the [fund] costs," he says. "Trying to second guess the market does not work.
"Advisers are jeopardising the client's future by trying to play the fund manager."
From launch, Succession targeted securing 85 IFAs with a combined total of £7bn assets under management within five years. So far, it has signed up 20 firms with a combined £2.5bn.
"To be honest it is the bigger firms that are approaching us now," Chamberlain says. "They are aware they will need to have consistent processes. Smaller firms can sometimes deal with this in-house, but it is different for larger businesses."
| Share | |
| Comment | Fund promos ‘as bad as tobacco ads’ – Chamberlain |
More investment news
Email alerts
Recommended reading
Categories
Topics
Comments
hmmmm
What a silly thing to say. Yes, fund managers quote performance. What else is there to differentiate between managers? Can it mislead the public? Yes, but only in hindsight. They are still making the best decision based on the information available at the time. This may come as a shock to someone like Simon, but know-one knows what markets will do in the future or how managers will perform. As for the arguement that managers are not able to provide positive returns, his view is a little simplistic. We've all had the tracker vs active arguments and I think again this can only be resolved in hindsight. Each decision (active or passive) must be made depending on the clients requirements. To close of either avenue is shocking. If this is his view he should be marching to Brussels and knocking down the EU's door. They are going to require all fund KFDs to carry a risk indicator, which will be created by analysing past performance. This is the major scandal, not fund managers promoting their success.
Posted by: GXR
Perhaps worse than tobacco ads
I absolutely agree with Chamberlain and Hooper above. GXR in his post appears to be the fund manager authority on silly things said. As such I suggest he re-examines his own post for both silliness and manipulative rubbish. I have yet to meet anyone outside the investment industry who understands fund performance reports and indeed many within the industry have little idea about much of what it all should mean. If public fund performance advertisements were outlawed I put it that that would be a beneficial to the public.
Posted by: CJ_51
Related articles
Most Read
This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.
Events
Poll
|
|
Job search
Ifaonlinejobs will open the right investment career path for you. Search hundreds of vacancies on www.ifaonlinejobs.co.uk now
In Focus
Rob Burdett, co-head of Thames River Multi-Capital, highlights some of the challenges facing...
Viewpoints
The darkest days of the recession following the financial crisis in late 2008 may be behind...
Misleading and pointless
I completely agree with this comment from Chamberlain. For years, my clients (all within financial services) have expressed their concerns at the typical fund management advertisements. It’s misleading and just a completely pointless when sat next to a whopping, great big, caveat stating ‘Past performance is no guide to future performance’. Campaigns such as the ‘Profit Hunter’ driven by well known providers has the potential to create a false feeling of security which can be dangerous to an end investor who perhaps isn’t as investment savvy as a provider/fund manager might hope. A lot of challenges faced by Advisers includes the explanation to the end investor on how to dig through the outward messaging, including those positive graphs and bold statements. Just to ensure that, as an investor, they truly understand what might happen to their money if placed in one pot. As a marketer, from my point of view, it’s crucial that when my client is in-front of an investor that they have the best items of collateral that present all the options available to match their investors’ appetite for risk. Typically, these do not include graphs!
Posted by: Sarah Hooper