The FSA is set to publish a Policy Statement (read: final rules) on adviser charging and service labelling later this morning.
Here, IFAonline revisits the major proposals in last June's consultation paper 'Distribution of retail investments: Delivering the RDR'.
Today's Policy Statement will set out the regulator's rules on the following:
Independent advice: for use only when recommendations are based on a fair and comprehensive analysis of the market, and where advice is unbiased and unrestricted.
Restricted advice: when a firm can only give advice on certain parts of the market, such as its own range of products, which must be made clear to the customer.
The professionalism proposals would apply to all adviser categories except "basic advice".
Firms must provide in writing whether they provide independent advice or restricted advice.
Restricted firms must orally explain how their services are restricted.
Advisers should be paid by charges set out up-front and agreed with their clients, rather than by commissions set by product providers.
Charges should reflect the services being provided to the client, not the particular product provider, or product, being recommended.
Charges should not vary "inappropriately" according to the product provider, or the product, a firm recommends.
Firms must communicate both their overall charging structures, at the outset, and the specific amounts an individual is charged.
Firms must provide their clients with the total adviser charge payable in cash terms as soon as this is practicable and make a record of the total charge.
The FSA is not seeking to prescribe the basis on which a firm might charge for its services - a firm, therefore, might charge a fixed fee, hourly rate, a percentage of funds invested or a mix.
Ongoing adviser charges should only be levied where a consumer is paying for an ongoing service, such as a regular review of the performance of their investments.
The exception will be where a client buys an investment to which they will contribute over time.
There will be a ban on receiving commission and rebating it to the consumer. The FSA says it does not believe the potential for product or provider bias "can be properly dealt with" while providers continue to set commissions receivable by adviser firms.
The rules come into force on 1 January 2013 but firms can adopt adviser charging at any time, although permission to renegotiate commission on past business is unlikely.
Firms do not have to revisit business conducted before the deadline and can continue to receive trail on products sold beforehand.
Providers do not have to offer facilities enabling the adviser charge to be deducted from the investment. But where they do, they must be in contact with the consumer about when the charge is deducted and consider whether it could have an impact on investment performance.
These companies must still separate their adviser charge from their product charge, even when distributing via in-house advisers. This would ensure, the FSA says, a "level playing field".
The FSA says it will will not tolerate retail investment product providers offering any incentives to adviser firms that are not explicitly designed to enhance the service to the client.
Any significant non-monetary benefits - such as access to training days - must be available to all adviser firms and not just a select few.
FSA says TCF requirements already cover remuneration of firms' investment advisers, but it mulls pulling across a Code initially written for banks and building societies over to retail investment intermediaries.
The draft code, which has 10 points, is designed to "ensure firms' remuneration policies are consistent with effective risk management".
The FSA says adviser performance should not be assessed solely in relation to recommendations converted into sales.
| Share | |
| Comment | RDR re-cap: What you need to know |
More better business news
Email alerts
Recommended reading
Categories
Topics
Comments
Related articles
Most Read
This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.
Events
Poll
|
|
Job search
Ifaonlinejobs will open the right investment career path for you. Search hundreds of vacancies on www.ifaonlinejobs.co.uk now
In Focus
Viewpoints
About 2.66 million people are looking to increase the amount of money...
RDR
One main point I'd like to make on the RDR in general is that as an IFA I am not a 'distributor' nor a 'saleman' of financial services products. If I were I'd be entitled to a payment from the product provider for distributing or selling its product!
Posted by: Derek Vivian