Categories: Economics / Markets
Topics: UK Election 2010
After last week's run-down of Labour's biggest financial cock-ups, IFAonline brings you the worst financial gaffes thrust on society by the Conservatives. *Warning: The following may stir some unhappy memories...
Some of these gems are from back in the Tory heyday, but being out of power for more than a decade hasn't stopped them fumbling with the figures.
As with our 'Labour list', please feel free to point out any we might have missed. (Un)happy reading...
The last day of March this year marked the 20th anniversary of the 1990 poll tax riots, when 200,000 British citizens protested in Trafalgar Square against probably the most unpopular tax in British history (outside the FSCS interim levy?).
The 'Community Charge' shifted focus from house price to the number of people living in it, moving the tax burden from the rich to the poor.
By November, the Tories had forced Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher to step down, with her still defending a tax opinion polls showed had just 2% support.
The annual tax-saving of the Tory party's biggest donor, who took his seat in the Lords in 2000 and so has been involved in setting UK law for a decade, is £12.76m, according to Lib Dem research.
That's £127m in unpaid British tax.
Ashcroft, who has given millions of pounds to Tory campaigning, confirmed last month he was non-domiciled for tax purposes after years of speculation.
Nice of him to pop back from time to time to vote on how us domiciles do pay tax, though isn't it?
In the 1986 Tory Budget, then Chancellor Nigel, now Lord, Lawson introduced an effective 5% cap on the surplus of an employer's pension fund.
Employers could use surplus assets to improve member benefits, or take a contributions holiday. Otherwise, assets above 5% would be heavily taxed. Predictably, employers opted for the holiday.
But the holiday is now over. In a report last year, actuaries Lane Clark & Peacock (LCP) said the pension black hole at FTSE 100 companies has hit a record £96bn, up from £65bn in 2003.
In a Telegraph article in 2007, London Mayor Boris Johnson analysed the worst recession in 70 years, and what to do about it: "This isn't the Black Death....The boom-slump cycle is a natural part of our history... It is like love.....there is no need to go into mourning for capitalism....and there is nothing remotely impolite, in these circumstances, about spending money and being seen to spend money. Far from it."
As every financial planner knows, people lose the £1m which would secure their and their family's future £50 at a time, buying stuff instead of saving and investing it. But at least according to Johnson, they will be the most polite people at the homeless shelter.
In 2007, Osborne proposed a flat rate levy of £25,000 on non-domiciled workers, which he said would generate £3.5bn and allow him to cut inheritance tax.
But only non-doms with over £62,000 in yearly foreign income would pay the charge and according to Treasury costings then, only 15,000 non-doms received income at this level. Osborne's proposal would raise a maximum of £650m - £2.9bn short of his total.
Another ‘number problem' with the plan was it assumed 150,000 resident non-domiciles. HMRC figures at the time recorded only 114,000.
In an interview with the BBC in September, Tory Mayor Johnson told Britain: "Bankers are the scum of the earth at the moment but they contribute huge sums of revenue to the Exchequer."
Not exactly in the spirit of TCF, is it?
At the Tory party conference in October, Osborne claimed he would save £13bn by upping the state pension age from 65 to 66 from 2016. The respected think tank the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) disagreed, saying not only would the savings take five years longer, they would fall £3bn short. And they should know - they provided the figures Osborne based his calculations on.
Reams have been written about 16 September 1992, when the Tory government was forced to pull sterling out of the European Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM) after the currency sunk in value below the agreed lower limit. But all you really need to know is:
1. Black Wednesday cost Britain £3.3bn.
2. Trading losses in August and September were estimated at £800m.
3. Taxpayers lost out most because better management of devaluation could have turned a profit, around £2.4bn if the government had kept $24bn in foreign currency reserves. Instead the Treasury spent £27bn propping up the pound.
4. Interest rates rose from 10% to 12% (and stayed that way even after Britain exited the ERM.....great news if you had a mortgage).
5. Guess who was 'Special Adviser' to Tory Chancellor of Exchequer Norman Lamont at the time......... David Cameron.
Did you miss our list of Labour blunders? Don't fret, you can read them HERE. Readers also felt we missed a few, so you can read their suggestions as well HERE.
Later this week: Lib Dem financial cock-ups.
| Share | |
| Comment | Election 2010: Tories' biggest financial blunders |
More economics / markets news
Email alerts
Recommended reading
Categories
Topics
Comments
POLL TAX
I agree with Harry Katz and if the Poll Tax had been labled ''Poll Insurance Contribution'' it would have been accepted by all. Calling it a TAX was a big mistake-(read Labour Stealth Taxes Manual)
Posted by: Tony Round
Tory financial cock ups
You have missed out the most serious event. What caused the recession in 1989? I was a Commercial Finance Broker then and was told by a Lender that they had been told by the BOE to stop lending. No explanation. Why would a Government deliberately turn against the people that voted for them? it tokk me years to find out the truth: Do you remember that Banks were lending to South America? This was because of the money that was flowing into the UK from the Middle East. The Government told the Banks not to lend the money in the UK and told them to lend it to South America, backed by HMG's guarantee. When the deals went predictably sour, the Government would not honour their guarantees. At a meeting it was decided that the only way for the Banks to rebuild their Balance Sheets was to keep interest rates high, increase the spreads on loans and repossess as much as possible. I just laugh when anyone tells me that the Tories have any idea how to run the economy and this true but sorry tale shows that they cannot ever be trusted. Vote for them at your peril.
Posted by: Chris Amos
Related articles
Most Read
This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.
Events
Poll
|
|
Job search
Ifaonlinejobs will open the right investment career path for you. Search hundreds of vacancies on www.ifaonlinejobs.co.uk now
In Focus
Two months left before the ‘real RDR deadline’ – are you compliant with the required professional...
Viewpoints
Recent market uncertainty has seen extreme volatility in investment markets over the last...
Poll tax was a good and fair idea.
I am no fan of any political party, but I'm afraid you a wrong regarding the poll tax. It was a very fair tax and an excellent idea only to be subverted by the ignorant masses, proving yet again that our sort of democracy brings things down to the lowest common denominator. I guess if Simon Cowell stood for office he would probably be Prime Minister. The idea of votes for 16 year olds is a nightmare. I guess Jordan would be voted in as Chancellor. Voting are should be 25 (unless you are younger and in the armed services) and the graduate vote should be reintroduced. (Graduates get 2 votes).
Posted by: Harry Katz