Brown's exit: What the papers say

Author: IFAonline
IFAonline | 11 May 2010 | 07:45

Categories: Better Business

Topics: David Cameron| Gordon Brown| UK Election 2010| Nick Clegg

brown-tired

Gordon Brown yesterday announced his resignation as Prime Minister - but he will not be stepping down for at least five months. "Extraordinary" says the Times, "Sordid" says the Telegraph...

The Times

Britain's government became the subject of an extraordinary bidding war last night after Gordon Brown announced his intention to resign in an audacious attempt to keep Labour in power.

In a three-sided poker game being played out across Westminster, Mr Brown threw his last card, dramatically opening the possibility of a deal with the Liberal Democrats that would dash David Cameron's hopes of making it to Downing Street.

Within hours, the Conservative leader had stepped up his offer to Nick Clegg, inviting him into full coalition with the promise of a referendum on changing the voting system.

The Lib Dem leader now appears certain to be heading into the Cabinet, along with some senior colleagues, by the end of the week, but with the identity of the prime minister in his gift. FULL STORY...

The Telegraph

Gordon Brown has been accused of a "sordid" attempt to keep Labour in power after offering his resignation in return for a coalition with the Liberal Democrats.

On a day of high political drama, Mr Brown seized on David Cameron's failure to secure a pact with Nick Clegg by opening formal talks to agree a so-called "coalition of losers".

In a surprise announcement, the Prime Minister offered to oversee talks between the two parties before stepping down by the time of the Labour conference in September, when a new leader would be chosen by party members.

If accepted, the proposal would mean Mr Brown remaining in Downing Street for another five months and voters being presented with a second unelected prime minister in a row. FULL STORY...

The Independent

Gordon Brown paved the way for a possible coalition between Labour and the Liberal Democrats by announcing his resignation yesterday in an attempt to derail a partnership deal between Nick Clegg and David Cameron.

Mr Brown stunned the political world by saying he would stand down as Labour leader by September but will remain Prime Minister until then if he can negotiate a deal with the Liberal Democrats.

But the bidding war between Labour and the Conservatives for Liberal Democrat backing and the keys to No 10 took another twist late in the day when the Tories made a more generous and "final" offer to Mr Clegg - a referendum on replacing the first-past-the-post system with the alternative vote (AV), in which people list candidates in order of preference. FULL STORY...

The Guardian

The British political landscape was transformed last night as an unbridled bidding war for power led to Gordon Brown proffering his resignation as prime minister in a dramatic attempt to secure Labour a power-sharing government with the Liberal Democrats.

Brown's surprise announcement on the steps of No 10 prompted an extraordinary Tory counter-offer to the Lib Dems: a referendum on the alternative vote electoral system, and a coalition government with seats for Nick Clegg's party in the cabinet. The proposed Tory coalition deal would last at least two parliamentary sessions.

The hurried Tory offer, previously seen as completely beyond the ideological pale for the party, was swallowed by shell-shocked Tory MPs.

Cameron said he would whip a vote in parliament to ensure there was a referendum on the alternative vote, but the Tories would then be free to campaign to keep first past the post in the referendum itself. FULL STORY...

More better business news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

Political Mayhem

It is difficult to know where to start! 1. The situation is deteriorating into farce. Brown said ititially he would await the outcome of Cameron/Clegg negotiations and only if they broke down and there were to be no deal, would he then enter into talks with Clegg. He did not. Instead he started to stir things up in a desperate move to control the situation. Clegg should have concluded his negotiations with Mr Cameron before entering into separate talks with Labour. He is showing both duplicity and indecision. 2. The election was not dominated by the PR etc options. It it had been, its rejection was obvious by the fact that the Lib/Dems lost votes and seats and the conservatives gained 97 and vastly increased their share of the vote. 3. Where did this idea of Labour and Lib Dems beiong 'progressive' parties come from suddenly? Neither party are worthy of that epithet. More labour spin here (Mandelson et alia). 4. No matter what the Lab/Lib Dems spokespeople say, including various peers (Steele, Mandelson etc) wheeled out by the BBC, the Conservatives DID win the election and by two million votes. 5. It is absurd to suggest that any other combination of parties than Cons/Lib Dem could be considered 'strong' and 'stable' the very conditions Brown (among others) says repeatedly are vital for the UK. 6. Mr Cameron should say what's on the table now is the final offer and if Clegg does not accept it, then so be it. Go for minority government and dare them to vote down the Queens' speech. 7. The economy and matters financial are vastly more important than considering the political system at this time.

Posted by: Adrian Ford

11 May 2010 | 10:44
Complain about this comment

Political Mayhem

It is difficult to know where to start! 1. The situation is deteriorating into farce. Brown said ititially he would await the outcome of Cameron/Clegg negotiations and only if they broke down and there were to be no deal, would he then enter into talks with Clegg. He did not. Instead he started to stir things up in a desperate move to control the situation. Clegg should have concluded his negotiations with Mr Cameron before entering into separate talks with Labour. He is showing both duplicity and indecision. 2. The election was not dominated by the PR etc options. It it had been, its rejection was obvious by the fact that the Lib/Dems lost votes and seats and the conservatives gained 97 and vastly increased their share of the vote. 3. Where did this idea of Labour and Lib Dems being 'progressive' parties come from suddenly? Neither party are worthy of that epithet. More labour spin here (Mandelson et alia). 4. No matter what the Lab/Lib Dems spokespeople say, including various peers (Steele, Mandelson etc) wheeled out by the BBC, the Conservatives DID win the election and by two million votes. 5. It is absurd to suggest that any other combination of parties than Cons/Lib Dem could be considered 'strong' and 'stable' the very conditions Brown (among others) says repeatedly are vital for the UK. 6. Mr Cameron should say what's on the table now is the final offer and if Clegg does not accept it, then so be it. Go for minority government and dare them to vote down the Queen's speech. 7. The economy and matters financial are vastly more important than considering the political system at this time.

Posted by: Adrian Ford

11 May 2010 | 10:49
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Should there be a cap on hourly fees?

Viewpoints