Vantis admits doubts over funding; Shares suspended

Author: Hysni Kaso
IFAonline | 14 Jun 2010 | 09:06

Categories: Better Business

Topics: IFA| Vantis| AIM

ftse-traders-big-jpg

Share trading in Vantis, the parent company of IFA Vantis Financial Management, has been suspended after the group admitted it may not have sufficient funding to continue to trade on a going concern basis.

Vantis had previously announced it was in discussions with both potential new investors and its debt providers in a bid to reduce its debt obligations.

In addition, Vantis' CEO Paul Jackson and head of business recovery Nigel Hamilton-Smith resigned as directors of the group on Saturday. Steve Smith, currently finance director, will take over all executive responsibilities until a replacement CEO is identified.

In accordance with the AIM Rules, Vantis' share trading is suspended pending clarification of its financial position.

"As has been previously announced, the board of Vantis has been focussed on reducing the company's level of debt," the statement reads.

"The board now announces that, although discussions continue in relation to the disposal of certain of the company's assets as well as with both potential new investors and its debt providers, it can no longer be certain that it will continue to have sufficient funding to enable it to continue to trade on a going concern basis."

Vantis Financial Management offers financial planning services across a range of areas including: investment, retirement, mortgages, healthcare management, employee benefits and tax planning.

More better business news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

Financial Planning

Whilst its never good to see a company get into financial difficulty, surely this is a prime example of poor financial management - i.e. spending more than earning, which is hardly a great advert for a firm of "financial planners"!

Posted by: You must be joking

14 Jun 2010 | 10:46
Complain about this comment

Demise of the Smaller IFA - I Don't Think So

It makes me laugh when I see this kind of thing. It is always the same when we have changes on the cards - everyone says it will be the death of the small advisor that is sounded. I don't think so, whilst we may struggle to keep up, at least we are financially sound. It is the oversize groups with large numbers of director shareholders that constantly take out of a business more than they earn that will go first. Another one bites the dust.

Posted by: Bob Donaldson

14 Jun 2010 | 11:15
Complain about this comment

Demise of the Smaller IFA - I Don't Think So

It makes me laugh when I see this kind of thing. It is always the same when we have changes on the cards - everyone says it will be the death of the small advisor that is sounded. I don't think so, whilst we may struggle to keep up, at least we are financially sound. It is the oversize groups with large numbers of director shareholders that constantly take out of a business more than they earn that will go first. Another one bites the dust.

Posted by: Bob Donaldson

14 Jun 2010 | 11:15
Complain about this comment

Good luck

Its never good news to hear of such difficulties, These directors presumably acted in the best interests of the business at the time, it didn't work. Some people have to take the entreprenerial route to drive businesses forward, enevitable some models will be better than others that is natural selection. They tried, it didn't work. Simpathy and best wishes for all those affected directors and their families, staff, suppliers, and not forgetting their clients who might have concerns. I wish them all well for the future.

Posted by: Mark Mason

14 Jun 2010 | 15:44
Complain about this comment

Am I missing something

The perception driven by the Media and the FSA is that financial services are ripping off clients, which surely means that adviser firms are making loads of money. Yet we continually hear of the larger firms having financial difficulties. Yes there can be high overheads and over ambitious management- but are so many managers so bad? It seems difficult to accept as an explanation in so many cases. Even the Insurance companies have run into so much difficulty that we are now down to no more than 20 or 30 viable options, from a population of 180 in the 1970s and 1980s. There are factors at play here that are not being addressed. We may be managing more money and assets than ever before, but we are still a contracting sector, and apparently not, overall, profitable enough to sustain and expend. The big question is therefore - why are see not addressing this anomaly.

Posted by: Glen McKeown

16 Jun 2010 | 11:03
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Should there be a cap on hourly fees?

Viewpoints