FSA break-up by 2012 hits RDR transition; Sants to stay on

Author: Katrina Lloyd
IFAonline | 16 Jun 2010 | 21:15

Categories: Better Business

Topics: FSA| Hector Sants| George Osborne

FSA chief executive Hector Sants
Sants

The new Government has announced plans for a total shake-up of finanical services regulation to conclude in 2012, which is also the deadline for IFAs to meet RDR requirements.

Advisers will be worried that during the next two and half years, with many final RDR rules still to be announced, the FSA will be dismantled and control of their sector will pass to the new independent Consumer Protection and Markets Authority.

In a major about-turn, FSA chief executive Hector Sants will also stay on at the regulator to lead the transition to the new system as well as head the creation of the Prudential Authority, which will be a subsidiary of the Bank of England.

Despite saying earlier in the year he would stand down this summer, Sants will now become the first chief executive of the Prudential Authority and a Deputy Governor of the Bank of England.

The move will dismay Sants' many critics who blame him for failing to ensure the FSA regulated the banking sector properly during his three years in charge.

Many advisers' fears will also have been realised that Chancellor George Osborne's plans to abolish the FSA in its present form have not gone far enough and the regulator will be renamed but not reformed.

George Osborne confirmed the break-up of the FSA its current form last night in his Mansion House speech in the City. He said it had become a "narrow regulator, almost entirely focussed on rules based regulation".

He said the Government is proposing a new system of regulation "that learns the lessons of the greatest banking crisis in our lifetime".

The Government intends to handle the transition to the new system of supervision carefully and consult widely, with the process to be completed in 2012.

Osborne said: "I can confirm that the Government will abolish the tripartite regime, and the FSA will cease to exist in its current form.

"We will create a new prudential regulator, which will operate as a subsidiary of the Bank of England. It will carry out the prudential regulation of financial firms, including banks, investment banks, building societies and insurance companies.

"We will create an independent Financial Policy Committee at the Bank, which will have the tools and the responsibility to look across the economy at the macro issues that may threaten economic and financial stability and take effective action in response.

"We will also establish a powerful new Consumer Protection and Markets Authority. It will regulate the conduct of every authorised financial firm providing services to consumers.

"It will also be responsible for ensuring the good conduct of business in the UK's retail and wholesale financial services, in order to preserve our reputation for transparency and efficiency as well as our position as one of the world's leading global financial centres."

More better business news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

Geuss who just back today...

The boys are back in town!

Posted by: David R

16 Jun 2010 | 23:51
Complain about this comment

Well Well Well

Once again the failure gets the promotion

Posted by: Fed up

17 Jun 2010 | 07:44
Complain about this comment

Even more work for consultants

So, yet more "Transition with consultation" with no real mention of consumer protection. When will they think about reducing red tape and actually listen to what the industry is saying?

Posted by: Stuart Duncan

17 Jun 2010 | 08:18
Complain about this comment

wither IFAs!

I am still not clear as to the position IFAs like me will find themselves if the FSA is broken up. Will the FSA baby, the RDR, be thrown out with the bath water? I shall have to take retirement before my wished for time if theRDR is retained so need to know if I must yet write to my clients explaining that I am being forced out of my livelihood by the FSA ( or will it be the Banbk of England?).

Posted by: Derek Vivian

17 Jun 2010 | 08:54
Complain about this comment

No Change

as my Dad used to say "same man, different hat"

Posted by: Also Fed Up

17 Jun 2010 | 09:32
Complain about this comment

!*/**!!)(#

I've kept all the FTs leading up to the Northern Rock debacle. King caused all that, teaching them a lesson by not allowing them to draw on emergency funding - a facility that later saved other banks. He was raising interest rates when anyone in the know could see that they needed to be drastically reduced. He hasn't a clue.

Posted by: Ken Durkin

17 Jun 2010 | 10:06
Complain about this comment

Sants

He would do well as a football manager, cos they seem to be rewarded for making a mess !!

Posted by: Phil H

17 Jun 2010 | 11:25
Complain about this comment

Reward for Failure

New boss same as the old boss - we just have been fooled again.

Posted by: Mr fisher

17 Jun 2010 | 14:18
Complain about this comment

Astounded

I rename this Ship 'Prudential' May as well be 'Titanic' As Financial Services ship is going down, the rescue boat is certainly deflated as Sants pulled the plug and no air is going back in. I think he should re train and requalify for his position as he cannot read a map or rescue the passengers. He'd sooner they drowned!

Posted by: Betty

19 Jun 2010 | 08:09
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Should there be a cap on hourly fees?

Viewpoints