FSA wants firms to prove product stress-testing

Author: Laura Miller
IFAonline | 25 Jun 2010 | 13:00

Categories: Better Business

Topics: Product design

sheila-nicholl

The FSA wants firms to demonstrate how they stress-test financial products and ensure customers understand how their investments will react in different market situations.

Quizzing firms about the way they test product behaviour in different market conditions could be part of a more "pre-emptive" approach to dealing with industry issues, Sheila Nicoll, director of the FSA conduct policy division, said last night.

Stress-testing means being clear about what the product does, who it is for and certain key characteristics such as the nature and scale of risks presented.

In a speech at the Scottish Financial Enterprise (SFE) last night, Nicholl said: "We may ask firms how they are stress-testing products to understand how they will behave in different market conditions and how that is then being communicated to consumers."

In January, the FSA first announced it was reviewing the area of stress-testing following a series of mis-selling scandals.

Then, Dan Waters, the FSA director of conduct risk and asset management sector leader said: "On stress testing, we have not seen firms adequately illustrate what they do to test products where it is appropriate to do so."

But last night, Nicholl gave the first indication the FSA would look to respond to what it sees as inadequate practices by putting in place a system of testing firms' stress-testing practices.

She added: "We have signalled publicly we are now exploring a wider range of tools in relation to "product oversight"

"This means we may take pre-emptive action in order to choke off problems before they become widespread."

The move is part of the FSA strategy to develop a regulatory approach which looks more deeply into the value chain steps of product governance, design and oversight by provider firms.

"Rather than simply waiting to see what happens after products have reached mass circulation to the retail public," Waters has said.

Last week, Chancellor George Osborne announced the Government would scrap the current tripartite financial regulatory system.

The FSA will be broke up by 2012 and its activities split between a new prudential authority, with Hector Sants as its chief executive, and a new Consumer Protection and Markets Agency (CPMA), primarily charged with conduct supervision.

But Nicholl said the shake-up did not mean a change of pace at the regulator, and promised more "sector-wide intervention" of the kind embarked on in the RDR.

"The radical nature of such a remedy requires a tremendous amount of work to justify such a course of action. But it is one that we will not shy from where we feel it is appropriate.

"This work will not cease with the implementation of the new regulatory structure - intensive and intrusive regulation is here to stay."

 

 

 

More better business news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

Sorry Am I missing something?!

I know it's Friday & maybe I'm having a monent but surely the regulator of product providers has some responsibility to stress test their products to a certain extent??!! What exactly does a regulator do?!! Yet again they can't appreciate this & responsibility gets foisted on the adviser in total!!

Posted by: Julie

25 Jun 2010 | 14:31
Complain about this comment

Who product tested the FSA then?

You have to laught I suppose, bit if the FSA had been product tested I suspect it would have failed time and tiem again. FSA cost since 2003/4 £3 Billion or so Compensation paid over to conumers over the same time £2 Billion or so. Really cost effective way to protect consumers I would say. Product Test the FSA please!

Posted by: Michael Fallas

25 Jun 2010 | 15:08
Complain about this comment

Another Toy

Stress testing is another little toy for the FSA to play with. But tell me, how do they devise what situations could occur, and what statistic weight will they give the results? After all they must have stress tested the banks (we were told they did), but it made not one iota of difference to the financial crash. Monte Carlo testing has been going on for years - and we haven't had a financial catastrophe for a few days now. I suppose the stress levels at the FSA are now being tested, so they are desperately thinking up all sorts of bright things to justify their continued existence. Doing their job competently would have been the best justification.

Posted by: Glen McKeown

25 Jun 2010 | 15:55
Complain about this comment

money for old rope

Not only do they charge us fees, They now want us to take on their workload too, while they sit back and eat £630000 worth of biscuits no doubt.

Posted by: lol

08 Jul 2010 | 12:40
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

fund5live

21 Feb 2012 - 29 Feb 2012

London, UK

event logo

COVER Breakfast Briefing: Cash Plans

27 Mar 2012 - 27 Mar 2012

London, UK

event logo

Buy to Let Market Forum

17 Apr 2012 - 18 Apr 2012

London, UK

Poll

Should there be a cap on hourly fees?

Viewpoints