The CII is offering candidates who failed one of its exams a free re-sit after it contained a flawed question worth more than a tenth of the overall marks.
Individuals who sat the AF1 ‘Personal Tax and Trust Planning' exam in April can also ask for a review of their marks free of charge, although they only have until 30 July to do this.
The offer follows a question on inheritance tax (IHT) in the Advanced Diploma paper.
It omitted information relating to the death of the settlor, which was required to calculate the IHT payable on the transfers.
A number of advisers contacted IFAonline and Professional Adviser saying they were uncertain about the question and expressing their fears it would affect their chances of passing.
Some said they left the question out entirely while others said the faulty question, the first on the paper, affected their confidence for the rest of the exam.
The CII has written to candidates saying it has marked the question both for candidates who answered it according to the settlor dying within seven years of making the gift, and for those assuming the settlor died after seven years, plus any combination of these.
It says due consideration has been given to all candidates who sat the exam to ensure none have been disadvantaged as a result of the error. This included, if necessary, reducing the pass mark.
It adds it is reviewing its exam processes to establish how the error occurred and ensure it does not happen again.
Lisa Medley, an account manager at Canada Life, said after sitting the exam: "You automatically think you have misunderstood the question, not that the paper is to blame.
"I spent ages reading and re-reading it, thinking it doesn't make any sense. For me, it overshadowed the whole exam."
The CII yesterday announced it was introducing more detailed feedback for candidates sitting its exams, including identifying specific questions failed.
| Share | |
| Comment | CII offers free exam re-sit after IHT question error |
More better business news
Email alerts
Recommended reading
Categories
Topics
Comments
Poor excuse
I took the AF1 exam in question - which I passed with distinction. I agree that question two was wrongly printed, but after a momentary panic and re-reading of the question it was quite clear that the examiner wanted a calculation of IHT on settlor death. This conclusion was based on the fact that the first question had asked for IHT in lifetime and the number of points allocated to this question was appropriate for the calculation that would be required for IHT on death. Therefore the only missing information was date of death. I prefixed my answer with the comment 'I think you have missed some information out of the question so i am answering on the basis that the settlor died today' and proceeded to answer the question. To not put anything at all seems foolish - particularly given that in a written paper you have the opportunity to explain the situation the poorly worded question has put you in, and by all accounts candidates would have got points whatever date of death was assumed. The CII should be duly apologetic for this mistake, but to reduce the pass mark or offer free re-sits seems insulting to the many candidates who did actually attempt to answer this question .
Posted by: TM
Poor excuse?
TM - you are an arrogant so and so!! Remember 'the higher the monkey climbs - the more he reveals!!!! All you did was spout off at how wonderful you think you are - very much like the FSA themselves - do you work for them?
Posted by: IFA
Related articles
Most Read
This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.
Events
Poll
|
|
Job search
Ifaonlinejobs will open the right investment career path for you. Search hundreds of vacancies on www.ifaonlinejobs.co.uk now
In Focus
Viewpoints
About 2.66 million people are looking to increase the amount of money...
cii exam remarking
Who are these pathetic candidates that cant answer a question on an either/or basis. They can't be IFAs surely? We have to think comprehensively. The CII must be equally pathetic.
Posted by: michael bates