Categories: Pensions - Retail
Topics: Standard Life
Standard Life's Stakeholder with-profits pension plans were hit by market volatility and lost 1.2% during the first half of the year.
The funds, which do not have investment guarantees, dropped 1.2% over the six months to the end of June (on an estimated gross return basis).
They have the highest equity weighting of Standard Life's with-profits plans at 57.9% at the end of June. The remainder of the funds was in fixed interest and other assets but not property.
Market volatility hit the plans in 2010 after a stronger period in 2009, when they rose just over 19%.
All of Standard Life's other with-profits plans increased in value over the first half of 2010, although with-profits bonds only rose 1.8%. They had an asset split of 43.8% in equities, 39.7% in fixed interest and other assets and 16.5% in property. The highest return over the period was 6% for unitised with-profits life and pension funds.
Standard Life said despite the market volatility, all annual bonus rates on its with-profits plans had been maintained.
Final bonus amounts vary according to the plan and its payment history. They are currently being paid on many unitised with-profits plans but MVRs apply to others.
The average MVR on with-profits bonds is 6.4% but there are currently no MVRs on plans taken out between August 2001 and December 2005, or after October 2008.
| Share | |
| Comment | Standard Life Stakeholder with-profits pension falls in 2010 |
More pensions - retail news
Email alerts
Recommended reading
Categories
Topics
Comments
Related articles
Most Read
This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.
Events
Poll
|
|
Job search
Ifaonlinejobs will open the right investment career path for you. Search hundreds of vacancies on www.ifaonlinejobs.co.uk now
In Focus
We all want certainty – and when it comes to auto-enrolment, advisers and their corporate...
Viewpoints
Clients now have a growing need for choice, flexibility and transparency when it comes to...
Misleading?
Should the funds be called "without profits", or "managed", er... "managed" is misleading as well because the funds are not in fact actively managed as is implied. Why not call it "slush fund"?
Posted by: Evan Owen