The FSA has fined members of the Royal Bank of Scotland Group (RBSG) £5.6m for failing to have adequate systems and controls in place to prevent breaches of UK financial sanctions.
This failure resulted in an unacceptable risk RBSG could have facilitated illegal transactions involving people under sanctions, including terrorist financing, the FSA says.
It is the biggest fine imposed by the FSA to date in pursuit of its financial crime objective.
UK firms are prohibited from providing financial services to persons on the HM Treasury sanctions list.
The Money Laundering Regulations 2007 require firms maintain appropriate policies and procedures in order to prevent funds or financial services being made available to those on the sanctions list.
During 2007, RBSG processed the largest volume of foreign payments of any UK financial institution.
However, between 15 December 2007 and 31 December 2008, RBS Plc, NatWest, Ulster Bank and Coutts and Co, which are all members of RBSG, failed to adequately screen both their customers, and the payments they made and received, against the sanctions list.
The FSA considers that RBSG's failings in relation to its screening procedures were particularly serious because of the risk they posed to the integrity of the UK financial services sector.
This is the first fine imposed by the FSA under the Regulations.
Margaret Cole, FSA director of enforcement and financial crime, says: "The involvement of UK financial institutions in providing funds, economic resources or financial services to designated persons on the sanctions list undermines the integrity of the UK's financial services sector.
"By failing to screen relevant customers and payments against the HM Treasury sanctions list, RBSG left itself open to the risk that it was facilitating terrorist financing.
"The scale of the fine shows how seriously the FSA takes this issue and should act as a warning to other firms to ensure that they have adequate screening procedures."
As RBSG agreed to settle at an early stage of the FSA investigation, it qualified for a 30% reduction in penalty. The FSA would have otherwise imposed a financial penalty of £8m.
| Share | |
| Comment | FSA fines RBS £5.6m for UK sanctions controls failings |
More better business news
Email alerts
Recommended reading
Categories
Topics
Comments
Goodwin
So Goodwin gets off scot free again pardon the pun and it is the poor shareholder i.e. the government that picks up the tab - oh dear
Posted by: Paul
Related articles
Most Read
This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.
Events
Poll
|
|
Job search
Ifaonlinejobs will open the right investment career path for you. Search hundreds of vacancies on www.ifaonlinejobs.co.uk now
In Focus
Viewpoints
About 2.66 million people are looking to increase the amount of money...
What has the FSA ever done for us?
How about using the fines money to reduce the deficit. The regulator is making so much from it's fining activities Georgie Baby ought to impose a stealth tax on the FSA - as tesco's say, 'every little helps!'
Posted by: Chris