Categories: Mortgages| Economics / Markets
Topics: Fannie Mae| Freddie Mac
Pimco’s Bill Gross says there will be no housing-led recovery in the US without Government support.
The veteran bond investor says mortgage yields could rise as much as 4% if housing agencies such as Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae are put into private hands, stalling the recovery.
"Ninety-five percent of existing mortgage creation over the past 12 months were government-guaranteed. The private market was nowhere to be found because they charged too much," he says.
"Having grown accustomed to a housing market aided and abetted by Uncle Sam, the habit cannot be broken by going cold turkey into the camp of private lending.
"The cost would be enormous in terms of yields - 300-400bp higher than currently offered, crippling any hopes of a housing-led revival to the economy."
Instead, Gross proposes the Government remains involved in mortgage provisions, by combing all housing agencies into one body.
"Taxpayers would be protected through tight regulation, adequate down payments, and an insurance fund bolstered by a 50-75bp fee attached to each and every mortgage," he says.
"The private market, to my mind, had really lost its claim as the most efficient and judicious arbiter in this particular case."
| Share | |
| Comment | Gross warns mortgage privatisation could 'cripple' US recovery |
More mortgages news
Email alerts
Recommended reading
Categories
Topics
Comments
Related articles
Most Read
This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.
Events
Poll
|
|
Job search
Ifaonlinejobs will open the right investment career path for you. Search hundreds of vacancies on www.ifaonlinejobs.co.uk now
In Focus
What is absolute return investing?
Viewpoints
At the start of one of busiest times of year it is easy to think about all the obvious things...
A strange claim to make
Interesting article. I found the claim in the last paragraph strange "The private market, to my mind, had really lost its claim as the most efficient and judicious arbiter in this particular case." The government backed lending is certainly cheaper but does this make it efficient? And what does judicious mean in this context?
Posted by: Paul