Categories: Regulation
Topics: Scottish Equitable
Scottish Equitable has been fined £2.8m by the FSA for a series of administrative failings including underestimating the value of customers' future pension benefits to the tune of almost £7m.
The life and pensions company, which was re-branded Aegon after its parent company last year, has begun a customer redress exercise following the breaches between 2002 and 2010.
It estimates the cost of redress will be £60m, of which £30m will be paid by the end of the year.
Scottish Equitable identified about 300 systems and controls failings, five of which were serious, the FSA says, and led to customer detriment.
Between 2002 and 2010 it failed to ensure effective internal governance arrangements were in place to manage the risks its customers were exposed to in a number of areas.
In particular, the regulator says the company lack of organisation and administrative processes meant almost 240,000 policyholder documents were not issued. It says 26,000 remain to be issued to customers.
Elsewhere, Scottish Equitable failed to trace in excess of 200,000 'gone away' policyholders and failed to calculate clients' Guaranteed Minimum Pension (GMP) payments correctly.
According to the FSA, it "significantly underestimated" the value of future GMP benefits resulting in detriment for 774 customers of between £6m and £7m.
The company also failed to identify and resolve systemic errors in calculating Fund Charge Rebates and Fund Value Rebates in respect of 25,000 policies resulting in customer detriment of about £5.7m and £2.8m respectively.
Finally, it failed to match Department of Social Security (now DWP) contributions to personal pensions for approximately 2,500 customers resulting in approximately £6.7m worth of detriment.
Margaret Cole, FSA managing director of enforcement and financial crime, says: "The redress package is significant news for the customers.
"This case shows the importance of getting customer administrative procedures right and fixing them quickly when they go wrong. This is a key part of treating customers fairly.
"By letting the issues build up over such a long period Scottish Equitable made it even more difficult to fix the problems and this led to delays in getting compensation to customers."
The FSA did give credit to Scottish Equitable for bringing the issue to its attention in September last year after attempting to rectify the problems in-house. The £2.8m fine would have been £4m but the company qualified for its settlement discount scheme.
| Share | |
| Comment | Scot Eq fined £2.8m and agrees to pay £60m client redress |
More regulation news
Email alerts
Recommended reading
Categories
Topics
Comments
Redress figures don't add up
I am intrigued to know how they calculated the full £60 million redress to be made when the numbers given in the article sum to a maximum of only £19.4 million. Is this sloppy journalism through a number-blind journalist, or is this another instance of the FSA representative not knowing what numbers it has charged(pace recent instances of Hector Sants giving different values for the same thing to different people)?
Posted by: Orlando Furioso
Orlando...
...there were 300 or so cases identified by Aegon, with the five mentioned above the more serious as they led to the most customer detriment. That is why the figures do not tally.
Posted by: Ed
Related articles
Most Read
This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.
Events
Poll
|
|
Job search
Ifaonlinejobs will open the right investment career path for you. Search hundreds of vacancies on www.ifaonlinejobs.co.uk now
In Focus
Two months left before the ‘real RDR deadline’ – are you compliant with the required professional...
Viewpoints
2012 marks a watershed for the Life companies, fund managers, banks and advisers who service...
Scot Eq
Surely not! But their admin. is so good !! (NOT)
Posted by: Claire C