London Capital 'faces £5m compensation claims'

Author: Laura Miller
IFAonline | 01 Feb 2011 | 11:00

Categories: Investment

Topics: spread betting| Gearing

london-capital-group

Online trading company London Capital Group (LCG) faces compensation claims of up to £5.5m if over a hundred investor complaints to the FOS succeed, according to a solicitor working on the case.

LCG, which is not to be confused with independent wealth management group London & Capital, confirmed it is dealing with a FOS query relating to commission rebating of a managed spot FX fund in the first half of 2009.

In a pre-results trading statement this month, LCG says: "LCG believes that should any liability arise from this, it will be immaterial in the context of the group as a whole."

But Alasdair Sampson, a financial services lawyer who has lodged 113 separate investor claims against LCG at the FOS with the help of five IFAs who advised clients to invest in the Forex investment, says the company could face a bill for up to £5.5m.

He calculates this as the difference between his clients’ total capital investments and what they have been able to recover after alleged errors at LCG which they claim led to abnormal losses.

LCG says it stands by the sentiments in its trading statement.

The investors, who held accounts on LCG's platform, claim the financial services and spread betting company repeatedly over-rebated commission to clients.

It went unnoticed for several months because LCG failed to regularly reconcile its monies.

Sampson says the problem began when LCG had to reverse certain trades.

"It rebated commission on the trades without realising none had actually been paid. This happened six times but wasn't picked up because the accounts were not being reconciled."

The result was that clients' accounts collectively were overstated by about £1.8m higher than the true balances, he says.

"This effectively geared the trading so all the accounts were over trading so any losses were exaggerated."

Had the clients known at the outset that LCG was not going to perform frequent account checks to ensure each held the correct amounts, none of them would have invested, Sampson claims.

“If the complaints are upheld then I will be submitting to the FOS that the measure of compensation should be a full refund of the difference between the funds invested and the funds recovered," says Sampson.

Commenting on the £1.8m overstatement in its accounts, LCG says there has been "no further recovery of the professional client debt disclosed at the half year" and no provision has been made as the directors have been advised the amount is recoverable.

Elsewhere in the statement, LCG said its full year profit before tax for 2010 is in line with current market expectations with full results due later this month.

 

More investment news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

There are no comments submitted yet. Do you have an interesting opinion? Then be the first to post a comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Are you more likely to use a Structured Product for:

In Focus

Viewpoints