FSA two-year restructure to cost £12.3m

Author: Rachel Dalton
IFAonline | 08 Feb 2011 | 13:00

Categories: Regulation

Topics: FSA| Hector Sants| Fees| budget

hector-sants

The melting-down and recasting of the FSA to form two new regulatory bodies will cost £12.3m between 2010 and 2012, it was revealed today.

In a CEO letter, FSA chief executive Hector Sants today outlined further details on how the transition to the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) and the Consumer Protection and Markets Authority (CPMA) will work.

He writes while the regulator has already begun consulting on its costs for the project in its 2011/12 budget, it now expects to spend a £1.4m on the transition from 'existing funds'.

This means the FSA's estimate has climbed from £10.9m, as outlined in the budget, to £12.3m before 2012.

Meanwhile, Sants explains the regulator will have to "reprioritise" its work-plan to "ensure due regard" to its need to focus on the transition.

"This will mainly be achieved by reducing some of our routine supervisory activity," he writes.

"Throughout this process, firms affected by these changes will be kept informed by their supervisors."

 

 

 

 

More regulation news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

Meltdown

If the regulator FSA or CPMA dissapeared off the face of the earth, what would happen? Nothing will change in terms of the effect they have for the consumer except A more postive environment to work within the financial industry as FSA always shout out who the baddies are when in fact they are the baddies. Consumer confidence is likely to come back. We would have less wasted money and bearocracy that hasn't worked to date within the F-Pack A free market to work within without regulatory manipulation/intereference Cheaper to run businesses which inevitably gets passed onto the consumers. Better deals for the public. Less financial catastrophes which are caused by regulations and strangulation by allowing larger institutions to by pass various rules e.g. less stupid rediculous rules = not having to circumvent them. Something small firms can't do. New innovative products would come back to the market something the FSA have killed off. A much more peaceful time by all and we would all be better off!

Posted by: Incompetent Regulators Awards Team

08 Feb 2011 | 15:51
Complain about this comment

money money money

No doubt that estimate will keep on rising until there is no similarity with the first figure. more money down the drain. What the heck, it does not come out of hectors pocket. When will we receive a "special levy" for this lot?

Posted by: lol

08 Feb 2011 | 15:55
Complain about this comment

FSA. £12.3 million.

Who,s going to pay for this. Us mugs of course. Someone will I hope wake up and smell the coffee one day. FSA cut fees/commission of the IFA but increase costs. What a laod of idiots.

Posted by: terry

08 Feb 2011 | 15:56
Complain about this comment

Thank you Hector

Bend over, grab your ankles and think of England, because you're about to be shafted yet again........

Posted by: Ballbag

08 Feb 2011 | 16:05
Complain about this comment

A two year rupture did you say?

Well now there’s a surprise. The FSA can spend money faster than a Bimbo with a credit card. Even by their standards this is a hefty wodge for staring at your navel. Most practitioners can tell then for free I’ll be bound. Mainly that the current system and personnel need binning and a completely fresh start needs to be made with people who have real life, hands on experience. But of course guess who will be a major recipient of all this consultation? You’ve guessed it – one or more the usual four suspects. Delottes, E&Y, PWC or KPMG. And where do you think a lot of the regulators come from and go to when they leave the FSA – gosh you’ve guessed again - the very same four. I wonder if putting one of the big four in the frame for a lucrative consultancy job has any bearing when you come to apply for a position with them when you leave the FSA? Of course not – after all aren’t they the ones who lecture us on ethics?

Posted by: Harry Katz

08 Feb 2011 | 16:21
Complain about this comment

Harry Has Nailed It

Read Harry's comments. I have nothing to add.

Posted by: Alan Lakey

08 Feb 2011 | 16:33
Complain about this comment

Respect has to be earned

and the end result will be what? Any better,don't think so, and i'll bet my last penny it will cost more than £12m and not make one jot of a difference to the "man in the street" - come on stop pulling the proverbial......

Posted by: Fraser Brydon - IFA

08 Feb 2011 | 17:47
Complain about this comment

Sundry Item

The cost of new letter heads has been overlooked. The new figure is £17.8 million.

Posted by: Restructure Consultant

08 Feb 2011 | 17:48
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Should there be a cap on hourly fees?

In Focus

Viewpoints