Treasury: New regulator will be 'more transparent' than FSA

Author: Laura Miller
IFAonline | 17 Feb 2011 | 13:30

Categories: Better Business

Topics: HM Treasury| FSA

A HM Treasury sign

The government has bowed to industry pressure to make the new Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) more open and accountable to the industry and MPs than its predecessor the FSA.

In a consultation on the new body, the Treasury says greater transparency will be enshrined in the FCA's regulatory principles as "an essential aspect of how the regulator itself behaves".

"The transparency principle recognises the importance not only of ensuring that appropriate information is provided in respect of regulatory decisions, but also that the regulator is more open and accessible both to regulated community and general public," it says.

The paper says the importance of ensuring the new regulator conducts its business "as transparently as possible" was raised by many respondents to the previous consultation.

Under the new regime, openess will stretch to a new power for the FCA to publish warning notices issued against firms including before any formal action is taken.

Both the Prudential Regulatory Authority (PRA) and FCA will be issued with the power, which will include publishing details of the grounds on which action is being taken.

Responsibility for regulating markets and conduct across financial services firms, including imposing disciplinary measures, will be carried out by the same team currently responsible for conduct at the FSA.

"[These functions] which have to date been performed by the relevant specialist functions within the FSA, will be largely transferred intact across to the new FCA," the paper states.

However, while FSA staff may be moving to the FCA, the new body is to be made more accountable to Parliament than its predecesor when things go wrong.

In a nod to calls from MPs and industry practitioners, the paper proposes the FCA produces public reports where there has been a "regulatory failure", which ministers can use to hold the regulator's actions and decision making to account.

Elsewhere, the government says it will give the FCA new powers to force a firm to immediately withdraw or amend misleading financial promotions, and publish the fact it has done so.

"Greater transparency around misleading promotions will engender better practice across the industry by making firms' misconduct more visible," it says.

Responses to the paper's proposals can be sent by e-mail or in writing to the Treasury up to 14 April 2011.

More better business news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

FSA migration to FCA

I trust these people will be obliged to apply in full for these new FCA jobs and not just walk across the room?

Posted by: Tim Hackett

17 Feb 2011 | 14:39
Complain about this comment

Remove the ROT

The only way this can be achieved is if the top 'corrupt' dogs are removed instantly. Otherwise we will have the same cr*p.

Posted by: Incompetent Regulators Awards Team

17 Feb 2011 | 15:10
Complain about this comment

Joke of the century

Same people just different name. What is the use? If the same people knew what they were doing, why change then? It is these people in the FSA need to be changed not the name. It is a joke.

Posted by: Amir

17 Feb 2011 | 15:15
Complain about this comment

TRANSPARENCY ???????

TRANSPARENCY (meaning clear). Does anybody really believe this rubbish? All the motely crew at FSA should be put on the scrap heap. To let them apply for jobs in the new setup is incredible, maybe as tea-boys and cleaners, but not in any position where they can do more harm. Mind you, they could all troop across the road to PwC where they might, just 'might' be accepted, as long as they carry enough bribery money to grease the already greasy palms at that institution. By the way, does anyone know what the sting at Keydata has amounted to? Interesting to find out, it's been several months since PwC accumulated 7m plus, so the kitty has to be at least twice that amount now. And we wondered where it all went, now we know.

Posted by: Norman Flight

17 Feb 2011 | 16:47
Complain about this comment

Expensive Joke

This is the Blair legacy - re-brand and move on. We are stuck with mediocrity and corruption at every level of Government.

Posted by: Mr Fisher

17 Feb 2011 | 18:13
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Should there be a cap on hourly fees?

Viewpoints