Lowes: Don't blame struc prods for FSCS levy mess

Author: Will Roberts
IFAonline | 22 Feb 2011 | 14:40

Categories: Investment

Topics: Lowes Financial Management

ian-lowes

IFA Ian Lowes has hit out at Peter Hargreaves for attributing the hike in this year's FSCS interim levy to structured products.

Laying the blame on structured products devalues investments which deserve to be seen as useful tools in any client portofolio, Lowes told the Hargreaves Lansdown executive director in an open letter.

"Be sceptical by all means," writes Lowes, "but to dismiss a whole investment area simply because we do not understand it is far from acceptable."

Lowes was responding to comments made by Hargreaves linking the significant increase in the FSCS levy in 2011 to structured products.

The managing director of Lowes Financial Management says he fully supports Hargreaves' stand against the FSCS rate hike and agrees the inequity needs to be addressed.

But he urges him to "stop blaming this matter on structured products".

"The collapse of Keydata was not caused by structured products, rather it was precipitated by the Secure Income Bonds and Secure Income Plans, US Life Settlement schemes, which had no underlying defined measurement and so were not structured products."

Challenging Peter Hargreaves' assertion Hargreaves Lansdown had never promoted a structured product, Lowes goes on to say independent advisers are required to have a broad knowledge across a range of subjects to satisfy client needs. By definition, this should include structured products, he says.

Lowes adds returns achieved by structured product plans maturing in 2010 show IFAs who discounted the sector out-of-hand may have better served clients by taking a more "open minded approach".

Five weeks ago, the FSCS announced it would hit the whole investment industry (including advisers and fund managers) with a record £326m interim levy five weeks ago. This was to primarily help compensate investors for the failure of Keydata.

More investment news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

Structured products and FSCS

The article doesn't mention that FSCS paid out £20m last year on Capital Secure Lehman structured products, £21m on SCARPS sold by NDFA in the early 2000's and could be paying out another £25m on Lehman products when Lehman SCARP investors with plans from NDFA, DRL and ARC are fairly compensated for mis-selling, subject to the claims of 2000 people with these products who have not yet been compensated.

Posted by: missoldinvestments

22 Feb 2011 | 17:43
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Are you more likely to use a Structured Product for:

In Focus

Viewpoints