RBS reports £1.13bn annual loss

Author: Rahul Odedra
IFAonline | 24 Feb 2011 | 08:15

Categories: Economics / Markets

Topics: RBS| Royal Bank of Scotland

rbs-logo

Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) has reported an annual loss of £1.13bn for 2010, improving on the previous year but still falling short of analyst expectations.

Although the bank made an operating profit of £1.91bn, it was particularly hard hit by a £1.11bn tax charge.

Forecasts compiled by Bloomberg had estimated it would make a loss of £406.5m.

RBS has previously racked up losses of £3.6bn in 2009 and £24.3bn in 2008, when it was bailed out by the government.

In Q4, RBS made a profit of £12m, improving upon the £765m loss in the same period in 2009.

Meanwhile, the bank's impairment charges on bad loans also fell 33% to £9.26bn.

Chairman Philip Hampton says: "The return to operating profit reflects both the internal rebuilding process at RBS and the external recovery in market and economic conditions.

"We are still a good way from where we want to be in terms of our performance but 2010 represents another big stride towards that goal."

More economics / markets news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

There are no comments submitted yet. Do you have an interesting opinion? Then be the first to post a comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Should there be a cap on hourly fees?

In Focus

Viewpoints