Categories: TCF
Topics: European Court of Justice| Martin Bamford| churning| Pension| FSA
The ECJ’s ban on gender-based insurance pricing may encourage more pension churning when combined with the effects of the RDR, Martin Bamford warns.
On 1 March, the ECJ ruled it is discriminatory to use gender as a basis for actuarial valuations. The move is likely to affect annuity rates and other pension incomes, and advisers are preparing to review all clients' retirement plans.
Advisers expect increased competition between insurers in the run-up to the ban coming into effect on 21 December 2012.
Bamford, managing director of Informed Choice, says the ban may encourage IFAs to churn pensions for commission, particularly if they are planning to exit the industry when the RDR comes into effect.
"There will be some opportunistic IFAs looking to maximise their commission earnings before now and the end of next year," says Bamford.
"People need to review their retirement planning as a result of the ECJ ruling, but this needs to be a genuinely independent and impartial review, rather than a thinly veiled excuse to churn pension funds.
"The only way to ensure impartiality is for the consumer to pay a fee for advice, so there is no commercial incentive to recommend a possibly unsuitable transfer."
Bamford also warns the FSA is on the lookout for pension churning as the RDR draws closer.
In February, the FSA's Retail Conduct Risk Outlook said it expects advice firms to attempt to maximise revenue streams to help facilitate their transition to the RDR.
"In some cases firms may do this in ways that produce poor outcomes for consumers," the FSA says in the paper.
The regulator warns providers may use the run-up to the RDR to acquire larger market shares by offering large commissions to firms.
It also says advisers looking to sell their businesses ahead of the RDR may attempt to build up their books to make their businesses more attractive.
"We have heightened our supervisory vigilance in this area and will continue to intervene where we believe high commission levels may be contributing to poor outcomes for consumers," the FSA says.
| Share | |
| Comment | Bamford warns ECJ ruling may drive pension churn |
More tcf news
Email alerts
Recommended reading
Categories
Topics
Comments
Indeed.
Bill, you missed out the bit about the advisers who are left having to pay the costs of any compensation awarded for any instances of mis-selling, by means of yet another additional FSA levy. I've never had a single complaint made about me, but this year I'm going to have to earn around £1,000 more to pay this levy while those who did the mis-selling are out of the industry scot-free and penalty-free. It's a bit like if a painter & decorator made a mess of someone's house, then left the trade. Client complains to the trade association he was a member of and they award him compensation. The culprit isn't there to pay it, so they say "never mind, there's another painter & decorator three towns away who's a member - we'll make HIM pay it." Why do we put up with this?
Posted by: David
Related articles
Most Read
This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.
Events
Poll
|
|
Job search
Ifaonlinejobs will open the right investment career path for you. Search hundreds of vacancies on www.ifaonlinejobs.co.uk now
In Focus
Two months left before the ‘real RDR deadline’ – are you compliant with the required professional...
Viewpoints
2012 marks a watershed for the Life companies, fund managers, banks and advisers who service...
Really?
The regulator is on the lookout? The financial press has instances of the FSA tackling rogue mortgage brokers from five years ago. Since the announcement of the RDR they have been, apparently, on the look out for those making hay whilst the sun shines on bonds - not seen any outcomes of that in the press yet it is going on in. Anyway, those that get away with it now will fold their ltd cos before it catches up with them, those that get caught may leave the industry a few months ealier, those that don't will pass the exams and carry on anyway. The consumer will pick up a bill for £1.7bn. The benefit will be???????
Posted by: Bill