FSA in firing line again for enforcement action

Author: Rahul Odedra
IFAonline | 06 Apr 2011 | 09:00

Categories: Regulation

Topics: FSA| complaints handling

fsa-logo

The FSA has been criticised for multiple failures related to its delivery of enforcement documents, including leaving unencrypted discs with a neighbour of the subject of an investigation.

The Complaints Commissioner received a complaint in relation to events which occurred at the end of August 2010.

He outlined the complaint: "You are unhappy that a courier, sent by the FSA, delivered a package to your neighbour (rather than you) between 10pm and 10.30pm at night.

"Specifically you feel that the delivery of a package at that time of night is unacceptable particularly as the package, containing sensitive confidential material relating to an ongoing Enforcement investigation, was simply left with your neighbour."

Outlining his opinions and recommendations, the commissioner, Sir Anthony Holland, criticises the FSA for leaving documents at the neighbour's house, a situation exacerbated by the fact they were not encrypted.

As in a previous case, the commissioner was also critical of the FSA's decision to send a package so late, suggesting a deadline of 8pm would be more appropriate

He says: "I am concerned that the FSA allowed documents to be left with a neighbour with no guarantee that the documents would be passed to you the next morning or indeed in a timely fashion."

In its response to the commissioner's comments, the FSA accepts leaving unencrypted data with the neighbour was an error.

It says: "It is, and was at the relevant time, the FSA's policy for disks containing sensitive material that are sent externally to be encrypted.

"Although no harm resulted, the FSA regrets that the policy was not followed in this instance."

However, it has once again insisted 9pm would be an acceptable deadline for delivering documents without any warnings.

More regulation news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

Complaints Machinery

The whole FSMA 2000 is just a Nothing but a complaints machinery. Complaints about FSA as they are useless, complaints about this independent commissions with no enforcement powers to discipline the FSA, complaints about IFAs being treated badly and abused, complaints about the FOS who is not even accountable to the FSA rules, complaints going to the FOS who ignore fraud, complaints about the FSCS fees, FSCS staff who can't even count or have a sensible system for compensation themselves. Complaints complaints galore................... FSMA 2000 = COMPLAINTS MACHINERY What heppened to some positive stuff. Like developing a savings culture, new positive pruiducts, tax efficient savings, life assurance to protect families, investments offering greater potential for growth, IHT planning, good mortgage broking for client s getting choices etc etc????

Posted by: Incompetent Regulators Awards Team

06 Apr 2011 | 09:45
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Should there be a cap on hourly fees?

In Focus

Viewpoints