Warning drawdown rules trapping pensioners with poor pots

Author: Rachel Dalton
IFAonline | 13 Apr 2011 | 12:00

Categories: Income Drawdown

Topics: SIPP| Self-Invested Personal Pension| AXA Wealth| HMRC

morrison-mike-1

Pension experts warn investors could be stuck in poorly performing plans, as transfering out could lead to a loss of income following changes to drawdown rules.

New income drawdown arrangements, which became available on 6 April, allow investors to withdraw 100% of their GAD or equivalent annuity rate per year, rather than the previous 120%.

However, investors' GAD rates, linked to life expectancy, are now assessed every three years, or annually after the age of 75. Previously, they only were revised every five years.

Investors whose GAD rates were reassessed before 5 April this year will not have to revisit them for another five years. But any changes to their drawdown arrangement, including moving provider, will mean the amount they can withdraw is subject to the 100% limit and more frequent assessments.

Mike Morrisson, head of pension development at AXA Wealth, says this could mean personal pension investors could be trapped in schemes they would rather leave, as switching providers could bring about a reduction in income.

"If you want to move your pension, you will go into the new limits," says Morrisson, pictured.

"High charges could cause you to move from one SIPP to another, or someone who is in drawdown in an old-style personal pension may want to move to a full SIPP to get investment returns to maintain their income. However, they would be penalised for doing this."

Martin Tilley, sales and marketing director at Dentons, says his firm will be raising the issue with the Association of Member-Directed Pension Schemes (AMPS).

"It is more important than ever for an IFA to choose the right SIPP for their clients because moving them in future may reduce income," he says.

Tilley adds HMRC should have put in place a transitional rule allowing investors to remain in their five year assessment period when switching providers, and only move to the new regime when that five year period is up.

However, Morrisson claims this system would be much more difficult for the Revenue to administer.

A spokesperson for HMRC says: "Whether or not an individual chooses to transfer their fund to another provider is a matter of individual choice and we would therefore normally expect them to consider the assessment period when deciding whether or not to transfer their funds."

More income drawdown news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

A non issue

The vaste majority of people shoudl NOT be drawing more than 80% of GAD, let alone 120%. The exception perhaps being where tehre is a gap between early retirement and state pensions kicking in. Additional legilsation to benefit a small minority would be a waste of time and effert. If it is that important to have 120% GAD, then stick with the existing contract, if charges are the main issue, then change, but accept the fact that the GAD rate etc will be reset.

Posted by: Nameless

13 Apr 2011 | 12:45
Complain about this comment

risky

If you need 120% or even 100% (or anything close to it) you should not be in D/down full stop. If this is the only money you have why are you in D/down or if you need every penny then buy an annuity, no agruing or discussion there.

Posted by: fr

13 Apr 2011 | 13:54
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Should there be a cap on hourly fees?

In Focus

Viewpoints