'Sense has prevailed' - Early access pension snub welcomed

Author: Rachel Dalton
IFAonline | 19 Apr 2011 | 13:15

Categories: Pensions - Retail

Topics: pension reform| Treasury| Suffolk Life| Fidelity| Hargreaves Lansdown

HM Treasury sign

The pension industry has welcomed the Treasury’s rejection of early access to pensions and supports reform of trivial commutation.

Trivial commutation rules dictate how and when investors can transfer or withdraw small pension funds.

Mike Morrison, head of pensions, AXA Wealth, said there was little demand from consumers for early access.

"Our research found only a third of consumers wanted to access their pension pot early," he said.

However, Morrison added there is a strong need for the provision of a wide range of savings vehicles to help investors save but still have access to emergency money.

Vince Smith-Hughes, head of business development at Prudential, said: "Sense has prevailed. Our analysis completely supports the Government's understanding that early access would pose a significant risk of undermining savings for retirement nationally - a risk not worth taking at this time."

Chris Jones, product and marketing director, Suffolk Life, said research conducted by the company suggested advisers were originally supportive of early access in January, but that support had since waned.

"The real issue here is engaging people with pensions," Jones said. "Early access was one way to do that, but changes to the state pension and other reforms with also do that."

Gary Shaughnessy, UK managing director at Fidelity International, said the government's pledge to develop and encourage occupational savings such as workplace ISAs is positive.

"The proposed system would make clear a considerable sum could be saved flexibly and people would have the choice of when to lock it into their retirement savings, and gain the benefit of tax relief," Shaughnessy said.

Laith Khalaf, pensions analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown, praised the Treasury's pledge to re-examine trivial commutation.

"The Treasury is looking into trivial commutation and equal treatment of workplace and personal pensions as, at the moment, people with personal pensions of under £1,000 may not be able to move their savings if they have other pensions as well.

"Improving trivial commutation will improve shopping around for annuities as people with pension pots of less than £5,000 are unable to use the open market option (OMO)."

Hargreaves Lansdown has previously called for a system whereby investors with small pension pots worth less than £5,000 are allowed to roll all of the money into one sum to purchase an annuity or take as a lump sum.

Under current rules, if the sum of an individual's pension funds is less than £18,000, it is considered ‘trivial', and if the individual is aged between 60 and 75, the money can be 'commuted' or withdrawn.

There is another trivial rule for ‘stranded' occupational pension pots, which can be withdrawn as lump sums if they are less than £2,000. However, this rule does not extend to personal pensions of under £2,000, creating complications for investors.

More pensions - retail news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

But who did they question ...

.... about whether early release of pension monies would be a good thing? Was it just pensioners and those close enough to (now) age 55?

Posted by: CONFFA

19 Apr 2011 | 14:02
Complain about this comment

Sense has prevailed - I don't think so!

I agree with CONFAA..... Who they questioned is a hugely material point but I would hardly consider one third of the respondents/consumers to be such a small number that they can or should be ignored. There are times when this industry and regulators are so far up their own a*$3 that they cannot see that they are complete idiots. The global financial crisis has caused all kinds of chaos in people's lives and the government and regulators had a big part to play in all of this. The least they can do is try to show they have learned from their errors and make sensible decisions from now on. Since pensions simplification arrived in April 2006 there have been constant changes to pensions which makes a mockery of the whole exercise and sums up that the government and regulators have a vested interest in constant change for the sake of it and despite all the claims to the contrary, the consumer is so far down the line of priorities it is shameful. How about making things simple for once. If someone wants access to their pension fund before 55, there is a tax charge. This would be a helpful solution to avoid people losing their homes and families splitting up and such like because of financial pressures. Those in their ivory towers cannot seem to see the merit in this. I know it has drawbacks but let's not forget whose money it really is. A clear regulatory warning document prepared by the regulator should be issued by the adviser and the pension provider for the client to sign and return to ensure no client can come back complaining about poor advice at a later date or that the adviser is trying to be clever. Is this such a daft idea?

Posted by: jonnieb666

20 Apr 2011 | 07:39
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Have you seen a decline in demand for SIPPs as a result of the proposed erosion on pension tax relief for those earning £150,000 or more?

In Focus

Viewpoints