Incapital blasts IMA and Hargreaves over SP criticism

Author: Will Roberts
IFAonline | 25 Apr 2011 | 19:20

Categories: Investment

Topics: Incapital Europe

sp-may08-09-gif
Chris Taylor

Incapital Europe MD Christopher Taylor has slammed Hargreaves Lansdown and the IMA for what he claims are commercially-motivated attacks on structured products – labelling their views a “duet of diatribe”.

Taylor, writing for StructurdProductReview.com, said Hargreaves Lansdown's outspoken comments on structured products are commercially motivated. He also claimed the IMA - which recently published a scathing study into the alternative investments - is simply representing the interests of providers it is paid to promote.

"It is hard to know where to start in countering this latest duet of diatribe against structure products, but as with most criticism of structured products what immediately jumps out is the points made by both Peter (Hargreaves) and the IMA are sweeping generalisations that are simplistic, misguided, outdated and basically wrong," he said.

Tearing into Hargreaves Lansdown following its "repeated outbursts" against structured products over the last two to three years, he said the firm's "soap box stance" appears to be commercially motivated.

"The bottom line, despite the criticisms of hidden or high charges in structured products, is that the charges built into structured products by most leading providers are generally lower than is typically the case with mutual funds. It is therefore difficult to give Hargreaves Lansdown both initial commission, that they can rebate to clients, and to provide trail commission that they can retain," added Taylor. "Simply put, this is their basic business model - and it is not, therefore, complicated to see the ‘rub' for Hargreaves Lansdown."

Meanwhile, Taylor labelled the IMA's study and comparison of a single type of structured product - the NS&I GEBs - against mutual fund trackers as "absurd" and no basis on which to castigate all structured products.

"Simply put, the IMA has no expertise or efficacy (or legitimate purpose) in commenting upon the structured products industry," he added. "The motivation for the IMA's interest in the structured products industry is clearly not end investor's best interests : it is, of course, the best interests of the providers that they are funded by and whose commercial interests they are paid to promote."

Concluding, he said investors "fundamentally" want solutions which carry less risk to capital and more predictable returns.

"Risk and return profiles have arguably never been harder to predict, manage and control, and this is precisely where intelligent use of intelligent structuring can add irrefutable value, alongside best of breed actively managed mutual funds and passive funds."

More investment news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

Where do we go for a non-biased view?

Both sides of the arguments advanced so far seem to be motivated by blatant commercial interests. IMA and their members on one side and UKSPA and their members on the other. For retail investors, this just reinforces distrust in the whole savings industry - not helpful.

Posted by: missold

26 Apr 2011 | 11:07
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Are you more likely to use a Structured Product for:

In Focus

Viewpoints