Categories: Regulation
Topics: Data collection| FSA| RDR
The FSA will use new rules requiring firms to publish the complaints records of their advisers to help "build an overall picture" of individuals, but it has promised to investigate fully any cases that give it cause for concern and says it will only ban advisers as a last resort.
Advisers said relying solely on complaints data could give the regulator a skewed view of individuals because complaints are often unjustified.
The FSA yesterday proposed firms provide details including number and type of complaint alongside advisers' individual reference numbers in their twice-yearly Complaints Return Forms and their 'Notification of changes' (Form D) documents from 2013.
Currently the FSA collects complaints figures at a firm level only.
But Peter Smith, FSA head of investments policy, said it would not rely solely on complaints statistics to determine whether an adviser posed a risk to consumers.
"This data would only be one element we would gather about an individual. We have more information we can collect about individuals and firms, all of which is helpful in constructing an overall picture of where the problem might be.
"The fact there might be a handful of complaints about a particular adviser over a short period of time does not in itself prove anything.
"Before we take any action, we would look in some depth at all the circumstances and see if there is a real problem there or not. We would also give the individual in question the chance to offer their views on the situation.
"All this does is give the FSA a better capacity to identify potential problem areas and, therefore, a better chance of being more effective in our supervision."
Smith also said the FSA would not automatically ban individuals based on their complaints records.
"We would look at the case in question. Is the issue with the individual or is it with the firm?
"We would then take a proportionate regulatory response to address the problem. It could be saying you need to re-do some training or re-sit some examinations to demonstrate you can do something the evidence suggests you can't. In certain circumstances, yes, it may be going as far as removing someone's approval."
The FSA wants firms to publish complaints data on individuals, including:
Firms will also be asked to provide information on an ongoing basis when:
The FSA says it does not intend to ask for detailed information about the complaint, but simply a notification of its occurence.
| Share | |
| Comment | FSA calms fears over use of adviser complaints records |
More regulation news
Email alerts
Recommended reading
Categories
Topics
Comments
Moratorium
Interesting thoughtr Harry, if a regulator who has apparently nothing but change on its agenda can be persuaded to pause why not stop all changes now and await the views, policies attitudes of th new lot. Why should they be stucck with all the last nminute activity of the current lot who seem intent on pushing everything through that they possibly can and I do not believ for a moment the suggestion made by my shadow that it is going to be revolving doors, same people, same views, same law, same interpretation and so what to the changing regime !!!
Posted by: alastair lyon
Related articles
Most Read
This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.
Events
Poll
|
|
Job search
Ifaonlinejobs will open the right investment career path for you. Search hundreds of vacancies on www.ifaonlinejobs.co.uk now
In Focus
Two months left before the ‘real RDR deadline’ – are you compliant with the required professional...
Viewpoints
2012 marks a watershed for the Life companies, fund managers, banks and advisers who service...
Not all bad?
Personally I think that the complaints reporting element is fair enough - it's the other stuff that seems to be somewhat over the top. However I read today that the new entity may well institute a regulation moratorium for smaller firms - so there may be a glimmer of hope. If not - there goes a few Sunday's as well as the habitual Saturday.
Posted by: harry Katz