IFAonline undercover: We probe 12% commission SIPP plan

Author: Laura Miller
IFAonline | 08 Jun 2011 | 11:00

Categories: Investment

Topics: UCIS

spotlight

IFAonline reveals how easy it is for anyone to earn 12% commission pushing 'SIPP-ready' property club investments in an Egyptian hotel.

We know advisers receive dozens of adverts for these kinds of plans every week but what are the risks?

David Ingram, director of support services provider threesixty, felt one scheme deserved further investigation but it is by no means an isolated case.

He agreed to go undercover to find out just how much due diligence one property club provider did on the highly incentivised people selling its products......

 

"Why Samra Bay Marina & Spa Resort, Hurghada, Egypt?"

1) We want you

14 April 2011 12:57pm - Ingram receives an unsolicited email advert entitled ‘Agents wanted for new SIPP product - Up to 12% commission' from Orbit Alliance, the selling agent for developers The Orbit Group.

2) Can't spell? Come in!

The ‘Becoming Part Of Our Network' button is riddled with errors: "Orbit Alliance understands what it takes to run a successful distribution network, and provide our agents with all of the tools neccersary [sic] ...and great commission with quartely [sic] sales incetives [sic]."

3) All welcome

He clicks through and is taken to a contact details form. Name, telephone number and email address are the only compulsory information; company name is optional; no request for FSA number

4) No qualifications needed

After a few minutes Ingram is called by Orbit. In a 90 second chat, Ingram volunteers he is not an IFA, and does not say how he is employed. The caller asks for none of this, or any information regarding how qualified he is to promote the high risk investment for SIPPs. 

5) All rooms come fully furnished!

One hour after the initial email, Orbit sends a summary of the Samra Bay project - with an Egyptian due diligence report on the site.

6) 12%? I want in

18 April 2011 10:17 - Ingram emails Orbit enthusiastically asking for the agency paperwork; "This all looks really good. Surprised that you need people to sell it for you!"

7) Sell! Sell! Sell!

Ten minutes later  - Orbit Alliance sends Ingram an Agent Commission Agreement to sign in order to begin "marketing" the investment.

 

Ingram's thoughts

"Apart from confirming my contact details, that I was interested in the opportunity, that it was OK to send the paperwork to me by email and asking for my company name - I stated I didn't have one at present - there was nothing.

"I volunteered I wasn't a financial adviser but knew people who I thought might be interested through my own business. They didn't even ask me what that business was."

"The literature talks about this as a SIPP investment and also talks of the right to occupy rooms, but does not point out this right should be removed for a SIPP investment."

 

The agency agreement:

Orbit Alliance said when any IFAs seek to become agents it uses a third party who is a former IFA to judge their suitability.

But looking through the agency agreement, the risks to any IFAs considering this "opportunity" seem huge, even BEFORE advisers' advice liability.

For example -

"3.3 For the purpose of marketing the Units, XYZ [the agent] shall only use such information and data as are contained in the Materials for the relevant product.

BUT

"5.1 Orbit Alliance does not assume any liability for the correctness of such documents, materials and information. In this respect, the content of the agreements to be concluded between the contracting parties will be authoritative."

So agents "marketing" this investment are not allowed to change the only documents they are allowed to use to promote it, but if the paperwork has any mistakes, Orbit is absolved of responsibility, leaving the agent to carry the can.

Alex Morris, partner at IFA Financial Relationships, said: "UCIS do have their virtues if run properly.

"I would invest in a UCIS after doing the right due diligence, with my own money, albeit a max of 2-3% in a massively diverse portfolio - but would not touch this with a barge pole."

Orbit Alliance responds:

Barry Clark, Orbit Alliance's marketing director, said:"After an 18 month due diligence process in which we obtained legal advice and contacted the FSA perimeter guidance team we started to market our individual hotel rooms that would be sold as non regulated commercial property purchases. 

"We looked to make our product compliant with the requirements for investment using SIPP and SSAS pension funds.

"Moving forward we will look again at the agreement and take the points raised in the article into consideration. Only six weeks into the campaign means it is positive we outline any teething issues early on.

"We will also look to smooth out and ensure there are more robust systems in place and ensure better training and handling of "potential agents".

More investment news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

undercover

I wonder if the FSA would share my concerns over the appalling lack of knowledge demonstrated by IFA's in this area. This type of investment is not UCIS (unregulated collective investment scheme)but far worse as it is completely unregulated and falls outside the scope of the FSA. "Unregulated" collective investment scheme is something of a misnomer. Far from being unregulated, these schemes are very tightly restricted by the various laws. One sweeping piece of regulation reads: "Such schemes cannot be marketed to the general public and are otherwise restricted in their promotion." As a result, the promotion of unregulated collective investment schemes must be carried out very carefully and only to selected groups of investors. Every fund structured as a UCIS must have a firm authorised by the Financial Services Authority to act as its 'operator'. This is because establishing, operating or winding up a collective investment scheme is a regulated activity and carrying out the activity without the proper permissions is a criminal offence. Other regulated activities which are likely to be undertaken include: Managing investments Dealing in investments as Agent Advising on investments Arranging deals in investments, and Arranging safeguarding and administration of assets. An FSA regulated operator is authorised to carry out all of these activities and the FSA lays down, in some detail, the framework within which they must carry out their business in order to comply with the Financial Services and Markets Act (FSMA) as well as subsequent UK and European modifications to it such as the EU’s Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) and the Prospectus Directive. Other obligations are placed on firms operating in this area by the wider law, particularly by the Companies Act, the Data Protection Act and the various pieces of financial crime legislation.

Posted by: Tony Sanchez

08 Jun 2011 | 12:18
Complain about this comment

What a surprise

Sometimes I wonder at the innocence or naiveté of some people who really should know better. On the world corruption index where the highest CPI score of 9.5 (least corrupt) Egypt scores 2.8 which puts it right near the bottom. Shock, horror. So why even consider dealing with such a country? Let alone some dodgy property deal. What next Tenerife Time share? Or Myanmar Office Rentals?

Posted by: Harry Katz

08 Jun 2011 | 12:28
Complain about this comment

Orbit

Here is an interestiung fact. Immediately after reading this article on IFA Online we received a marketing e-mail from Orbit Alliance. Makes me a little paranoid.

Posted by: Cooper34

08 Jun 2011 | 12:53
Complain about this comment

Common Sense Test

For advisers and consumers. Whether you love or hate the FSA, at least they are the UK's regulatory authority and even though Hector Sants tells us their are bulletproof, a simple commons sense approach to anything and due diligence based on that has got to be the starting point. UK, EU, other major developed state, not one which has been on the brink of anarchy for anything more than 1% of your investments. Even when dealing with UK regulated firms holding investments regulated in the EU, things can go wrong (Keydata), but at least there is an FSA, FOC and FSCS system to try and sort things out (of badly)

Posted by: Nameless

09 Jun 2011 | 07:45
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Are you more likely to use a Structured Product for:

In Focus

Viewpoints