FSA warns investors over Connaught Income funds

Author: Rahul Odedra
IFAonline | 27 May 2011 | 12:20

Categories: Investment

Topics: FSA

fsa-logo

The FSA has advised investors in Connaught funds (Series 1 and 2), offered by Connaught Asset Management, to consider speaking with their financial adviser or stockbroker to ensure the investment is suitable.

It says the funds have been advertised as low risk and could be misleading to investors.

The FSA says: "In the literature we have seen, the Connaught funds are described as ‘very low risk' and ‘low risk'. It makes comparisons between investing in them and putting your money in high street bank and building society accounts. We believe this is misleading."

"Connaught's marketing material compares the returns on its funds with fixed-rate notice bank and building society accounts. However, customers need to be aware that these bank accounts have stronger investor protections should anything go wrong and offer lower risks to your money than there is investing in the Connaught funds.

"Furthermore, these funds offer a quarterly ‘fixed income payment'. Although, the probability of you receiving this payment depends significantly on the performance of the investments within the funds. We believe this is not explained well enough to investors."

The FSA adds that Connaught also offers an "additional guarantee on the income" within the funds, but it says it is unclear if investors would be able to understand what this guarantee is.

The warning affects consumers who are considering investing, or have invested in the Connaught funds, whether directly, though a Self Invested Personal Pension (SIPP), Small Self Administered Scheme (SSAS), an investment bond or an offshore investment bond.

Reacting to the warning, Mike Davies, chairman of Connaught Asset Management, said: "Connaught whole heartedly supports the role of the FSA in protecting the consumer and we welcome this feedback on our Fund documentation.

"Connaught has always taken the clear disclosure of risk as well as benefits very seriously and to this end engaged the services of specialist legal advisers to review its documentation and processes before the launch of each Fund.

"We firmly believe that all financial advisers have sufficient information within our documentation and from the series of seminars we ran recently to ensure they can advise appropriately on our products.

"However, we take our role as a prudent Asset Manager very seriously and we will be conducting a further review of our documentation immediately.

"We encourage all financial advisers to engage with us before using our products, or in the after sales environment, and we would welcome those advisers contacting us if they have any concerns as a result of this Consumer Notice."

More investment news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

Defending! Connaught

It seems that Connaught are the current target for unjustified attack on a number of fronts. Initially the problem was lack of cover from the FSCS due to the funds being UCIS. It now seems the problem is that the funds are dependent on the performance of the underlying assets - does that not apply to Regulated CIS? Have we now awoken to the fact that ownership of the underlying asset is as good as any compensation scheme? OK with hindsight the description of the fund as low risk may be questionable, after all it has only done exactly "what it says on the tin" every quarter from launch. Under the new Europe-wide rules for risk disclosure to be included in Key Facts documents for CIS (CESR document) the measure of risk is volatility. Were the Connaught Funds CIS rather than UCIS, would that give them a risk rating of 1 (on the prescribed scale 1-7 with 1 being lowest volatility)? Where do bank deposits stand here - returns can vary dramatically from year to year? After all banks do something very similar to Connaught - borrow cheap and lend "less cheap". It is essential that IFAs carry out in depth due diligence on any fund they wish to recommend, most certainly where the fund is a UCIS. Having done that and satisfied themselves that there is adequate governance and custody of assets that should suffice providing they explain fully the risks to the client including the lack of investor protection AND THAT THE PRODUCT IS SUITABLE FOR THE CLIENT. Connaught are a progressive company offering products the customer wants (indeed several have copied the model) and perhaps it's time to stop the negativity and look at the positives.

Posted by: Interested

27 May 2011 | 17:27
Complain about this comment

Agree with Defening Connaught

My two pence - I agree entirely with Defending Connaught. They have beaten, bullied, battered and have been the subject of an IFA Online story that was full of errors. Time to leave them alone and move on. Well said Defending Connaught.

Posted by: Jesper

27 May 2011 | 20:12
Complain about this comment

Errors?

A story that was "full of errors?" Are you sure Jesper? Because Connaught issue a statement saying that there were errors that means there were errors? Thats a touch naive. I think that there is still much, much more to come out of this...

Posted by: Jeff Thompson

29 May 2011 | 10:16
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Are you more likely to use a Structured Product for:

In Focus

Viewpoints