L&G: Forcing OMO 'counterproductive'

Author: Rachel Dalton
IFAonline | 31 May 2011 | 10:16

Categories: Annuities

Topics: annuity rates| open market option| legal & general| ABI

legal-and-general-roadshow-logo

Making shopping around for an annuity the default option for all investors will be “counterproductive”, Legal and General (L&G) warned.

Its comments come after the Pensions Income Choice Association (PICA) called for the provision of a default annuity option in communications to at-retirement investors to be removed.

Instead, PICA said people about to purchase an annuity should be sent a "pension passport" to help them access the Open Market Option (OMO).

This move, PICA said, could help pensioners generate up to an extra £7bn in retirement income.

However, Tim Gosden, head of annuity product development at L&G, said for some investors it is inappropriate to remove the default option from communications with investors.

"Forcing people to shop around is counterproductive as some people are completely disengaged with their pension," said Gosden.

"This small minority will end up doing nothing and buying no annuity if shopping around is the default.

"In many instances, these people are with big providers who have decent annuity rates anyway.

"Some of these people will have pots which are too small to receive advice on or get a good deal from with another provider."

Gosden added no change to current requirements to make consumers aware of the OMO should be made until the industry understands why some people choose not to switch providers.

"The ABI says two-thirds of people are aware of the OMO, and one-third choose to stay with their current provider, and we need to know why this happens."

Hargreaves Lansdown's Tom McPhail, chairman of PICA, said: "Every investor can potentially benefit from shopping around.

"This might be because they can get an enhanced annuity, which are available for pots as small as £500, or because they can use trivial commutation or just because we want to get them thinking about the death benefits their dependents will need.

"There is no question of forcing people to shop around. What we are seeking to develop is a retirement process which naturally directs investors to gravitate to the most appropriate solution for them."

More annuities news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

There are no comments submitted yet. Do you have an interesting opinion? Then be the first to post a comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Should there be a cap on hourly fees?

In Focus

Viewpoints