IFP and CII awarded accredited body status

Author: Will Roberts
IFAonline | 06 Jun 2011 | 12:25

Categories: Regulation

Topics: multi-asset

fsa-logo

The Institute of Financial Planning (IFP) and the Chartered Insurance Institute (CII) have been named among six organisations that will operate as accredited bodies under the FSA's new training and competence regime.

In a quarterly consultation paper today, the regulator says it also intends to confer accredited status on the the CFA Society of the UK, the Chartered Institute for Securities and Investment, the Chartered Institute of Bankers in Scotland and the Institute of Financial Services.

Accredited bodies will form a key part of the regulator's new training and competence regime and will be responsible for issuing Statements of Professional Standing (SPS).

The regulator adds it is "very unlikely" any of the accredited bodies are 100% ready now to perform their role in terms of having the necessary systems and controls in place as the criteria is based on what it expects them to have from 31 December, 2012.

It said it may require applicants to carry out additional remedial work which they will have to confirm has been completed "well in advance" of the Retail Distribution Review (RDR) deadline.

"We have also told each applicant that we expect their next annual audit report to demonstrate how they have made the intended progress in developing their capabilities and/or their systems and controls, where these are not already in place," said the paper. 

"We have encouraged each accredited body to publish their annual audit report although we have not made this a requirement."

The regulator added it expects further applications from potential bodies and will consult on this in due course.

Meanwhile, the FSA also published a list of required qualifications it proposes to add to its draft handbook text.

 

 

 

 

More regulation news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

The Ethical position with mandatory codes

Contrary to the FSA's statement that you would not have to be a member of a "Professional Body" in order to obtain a Statement of Professional Standing in order to continue to practice and that you would be required to confirm adherence to the FSA code of conduct for approved persons, it appears that MEMBERSHIP of a body is by default going to be mandatory as so far IFS, the CII and the CSSI are stating that you will have to be a member in order for them to sign an SPS. As I have said elsewhere mandatory membership of a body in order to be able to work or get on in life is how the current Pope ended up a member of the Hitler Youth and how many people ended up members of the communist or Nazi parties. IF someone is qualified to level 4 and confirms they will abide by the FSAs rules for approved persons, they should NOT have to join a "body" simply in order to be able to trade. This is morally WRONG and makes signing a code meaningless as people will sign anything to be able to work.

Posted by: Phil Castle

06 Jun 2011 | 12:37
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Should there be a cap on hourly fees?

In Focus

Viewpoints