Categories: Regulation
Topics: stockbroking| FSCS| levy
Stockbroker and investment managemer Charles Stanley has hit out at the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) and called for a different levying system after being hit with a £2.6m bill to compensate Keydata customers.
The outburst came as the firm announced a 2010/11 pre-tax profit of £17.7m, up 29.2% from 2009/10.
"The FSCS... imposes levies on companies like ours to compensate victims of loss caused by the collapse or misbehaviour of other, completely unrelated firms," said Sir David Howard, chairman of Charles Stanley said.
"More often than not these appear to be rogue businesses, operating in areas of the industry unrelated to us, marketing products or services that should have been stopped at inception."
Last year, Charles Stanley was ordered to pay a levy of £683,000, but after the collapse of Keydata, levies have rocketed to a total of over £300m, and the firm was hit with a bill for £2.6m.
"We join with the many companies, professional bodies and trade associations that are calling for a high-level enquiry into how such a thing, on such a scale, could possibly have been allowed to happen," Howard said.
Despite the levies, this year Charles Stanley's revenue hit £125.6m, up 9.2% from 2010's £115m.
Funds under the management and administration of the firm increased by 13.3% from £12.8bn to £14.5bn.
In May this year, the firm acquired Jobson James Financial Services in a £2m takeover deal.
| Share | |
| Comment | Charles Stanley hits out at £2.6m Keydata bill |
More regulation news
Email alerts
Recommended reading
Categories
Topics
Comments
Related articles
Most Read
This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.
Events
Poll
|
|
Job search
Ifaonlinejobs will open the right investment career path for you. Search hundreds of vacancies on www.ifaonlinejobs.co.uk now
In Focus
Two months left before the ‘real RDR deadline’ – are you compliant with the required professional...
Viewpoints
2012 marks a watershed for the Life companies, fund managers, banks and advisers who service...
Independant Investigation Urgently Needed
It needs to be asked WHY those who criticise advisers who used the Life Settlement Plans feel they knew better than the author commissioned by Keydata with editorial independance. An extract appears below. As part of my due diligence I ensured I had checked the credentials of the writer and yet the IMA wish to call for ALL advice given on Keydata plans to be looked at, when in fact perhaps it should be what actually happened is looked at BEFORE any witch hunt. Extract follows; Product review by Debbie Harrison, SeniorVisiting Fellow of the Pensions Institute at Cass Business School and contributor to the FinancialTimes The Secure Income Plan offers private investors attractive income and growth prospects via a relatively new asset class – the secondary market in US life assurance products – hitherto only available to institutional investors. About the author Debbie Harrison is a SeniorVisiting Fellow at the Pensions Institute, Cass Business School, where she is a researcher and the co-author of four landmark pensions reports. Elsewhere she has published a wide range of UK and global retail and institutional finance books and research reports and has been a contributor to the FinancialTimes on pensions, investment, alternatives and expatriate issues for 20 years. In addition Debbie is a consultant to major financial institutions and also runs financial training courses for institutions and government departments, including the Department forWork and Pensions, HM Revenue & Customs, and the Office for National Statistics. She is a trustee of the Financial Inclusion Centre, a financial research charity, and she is an adviser to the DWP on pension reform. Keydata commissioned Debbie to write this product review.The firm provided technical assistance but she retained editorial control throughout.
Posted by: Nameless