MPs told public warning notices will 'disengage' consumers

Author: Laura Miller
IFAonline | 16 Jun 2011 | 13:08

Categories: Regulation

Topics: coalition government

House of Parliament

Government plans to use transparency and disclosure as a regulatory tool - including publishing warning notices against advice firms - could hurt consumer confidence in the industry and make them disengaged from financial services entirely, the Treasury has been warned.

The comments appear in the government's white paper on financial services reform, A new approach to financial regulation: the blueprint for reform, which includes responses to the government's February consultation.

One of the proposals in the February paper was to allow the FSA's successor the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to publish warning notices against firms which may face regulatory action.

But industry respondents told MPs the disclosure could have "unintended consequences" if consumers lost confidence in the industry and hence made irrational or uninformed decisions.

Alternatively, they said it could make consumers "disengaged from financial services entirely".

Other respondents raised the threat of action against the regulator for redress, saying the disclosure proposals posed a risk of costly reputational damage to firms.

Publishing details of potential regulatory action could also damage the interests of consumers if it affected the share price of listed companies, they said.

It was suggested the FCA be given the ability, rather than a duty, to publish notices.

For example, where a firm contests the FCA's direction or is a ‘serial offender', or where an advertisement is misleading beyond reasonable doubt.

However some consumer groups said the proposals should go further, enabling the FCA, for example, to publish firm-specific results of its thematic work, or to require firms to provide relevant price data on their products.

Industry respondents argued disclosure should be "the exception rather than the norm".

"Threat of disclosure could lead to firms being more likely to propose early
settlement rather than enforcement cases being taken to their conclusion.

"Or the FCA could be incentivised to push through enforcement action at all costs so as to not have to publish a notice of discontinuance."

The Treasury is requesting responses to today's paper until 8 September 2011, which can be emailed to financial.reform@hmtreasury.gsi.gov.uk.

More regulation news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

Don't tell the children - Back to the Nany state

Consumers are NOT idiots. Regulators usually are and the difficult thing with being truthful is sticking to the facts and not presenting them in a way for your own ends, which is what the FSA usually seem to do. They are very good at deciding on an outcome and then twisting the facts to match that outcome. I woudl STILL rather see the facts put out for the consumer rather than us be treated like children. At least if we have teh figures and facts, we can make further enquiries based on teh figures and come to our own conclusions. Whatever happened to a transparent regulator or open and transparant goverment?

Posted by: Nameless

16 Jun 2011 | 13:41
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Should there be a cap on hourly fees?

In Focus

Viewpoints