IDS: No u-turn on women’s state pension proposals

Author: Rachel Dalton
IFAonline | 20 Jun 2011 | 17:00

Categories: Pensions - Retail

Topics: state pension| pension reform| retirement age| coalition government

iain-duncan-smith-june-2007

Iain Duncan Smith this evening said there would be no u-turn on controversial proposals to raise the women’s state pension age (SPA) to 66 by 2020.

However, the secretary of state for work and pensions, hinted the coalition would be open to later amendments which would help soften the blow for women particularly affected.

In the second reading of the Pensions Bill today, Duncan Smith said there would be no change to the current schedule, which equalises men and women's SPAs at 65 in 2018 and increases them together to 66 in 2020.

When asked repeatedly if the government would be open to amendments to assist women aversely affected by the Bill, Duncan Smith would only answer that the coalition has no plans to alter the schedule for reform today, but would "look at transitional arrangements" later.

In response to questioning from shadow pensions minister Rachel Reeves, in which she asked if the coalition would consider a compromise of raising the state pension more slowly, but to a higher age eventually, Duncan Smith said:

"If the honourable lady wants to amend the Bill in that way at the committee stage, so be it."

Opposition to the Bill, which will lead to some women born in 1954 having to wait for up to two more years to collect their pensions, had been growing since the Bill's first reading nine weeks ago.

This morning, the Treasury and the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) denied pressure from the unions and the opposition would force the government to alter the bill.

More pensions - retail news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

confused

I am confused by this...women are unhappy about being treated equally??

Posted by: James

21 Jun 2011 | 12:08
Complain about this comment

confused?

Women have wanted to be treated equally for a long time but unfortunately a lot of older women haven't been and therefore haven't had the same opportunities. It was the norm to not get the job or be paid less because you were a woman. How were they ever going to build up a decent pension pot on a woman's wage? It is right that things should be equal including the retirement ages but only for younger women who have started on a more equal footing.

Posted by: Belinda

21 Jun 2011 | 13:20
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Have you seen a decline in demand for SIPPs as a result of the proposed erosion on pension tax relief for those earning £150,000 or more?

In Focus

Viewpoints