Categories: Mortgages
Topics: AMI| FSA| mortgage fraud
The Association of Mortgage Intermediaries (AMI) has hit back at lenders who claimed third parties, including brokers, represented some of the industry's biggest fraud risks.
Robert Sinclair, AMI director, said lenders had responsibilities of their own and pointed out their direct sales staff can also be involved in fraudulent transactions.
Earlier, lenders had flagged solicitors, brokers and surveyors as major risks in the fight against fraud. The concern appeared in the FSA's thematic review of lenders' systems and controls, published yesterday.
But Sinclair (pictured) said: "We continue to support the drive to reduce the level of fraudulent activity in the mortgage market.
"However, for mortgage fraud to be prevented all parties must be diligent, including lenders and solicitors," he said.
Sinclair said lenders should always be "diligent when reviewing their broker panels but any action taken should be appropriate and proportionate."
A mortgage adviser register is an idea AMI has always supported, and Sinclair said it would be useful for the industry to be able to identify rogue operators and stop them moving between firms.
"We are therefore disappointed that FSA has delayed the introduction of individual registration for mortgage sellers until at least 2013," he said.
In yesterday's thematic review the FSA said that, despite improvements in lenders' oversight of relationships with solicitors, there is scope for "significant improvement" in how lenders manage relationships with brokers.
It said it was concerned some lenders relied solely on a mortgage broker's entry in the FSA register to vet them.
"Checking the register can be the first step of a due diligence process but it cannot be regarded as sufficient to provide complete assurance," it said.
"Recent FSA enforcement action has shown very clearly that even FSA approved brokers do not always act with integrity or take steps to mitigate mortgage fraud risk.
"Lenders must take steps to satisfy themselves of a broker's suitability on an ongoing basis," said the regulator.
| Share | |
| Comment | AMI hits back at lenders over fraud risk slur |
More mortgages news
Email alerts
Recommended reading
Categories
Topics
Comments
Related articles
Most Read
This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.
Events
Poll
|
|
Job search
Ifaonlinejobs will open the right investment career path for you. Search hundreds of vacancies on www.ifaonlinejobs.co.uk now
In Focus
What is absolute return investing?
Viewpoints
2012 marks a watershed for the Life companies, fund managers, banks and advisers who service...
Shop the weasels
I wouldn't let a dodgy broker just walk away from my outfit; certainly, if I fired someone for cause, I'd tell the FSA about them whether or not they were an approved person - to make sure this was taken into account if they ever did become one. No reputable operator wants crooks in the industry; by helping the FSA build up their intelligence records now, that 2013 implementation date can be a brick wall to a lot of undesirables. All it takes is an email - I've fired thisi person;, this is why; here's their name, date of birth, NI number. Send it to whistle@fsa.gov.uk (my old colleagues won't thank me for that, but it's the quickest route to the right desk) and you've done your bit. "Simples".
Posted by: Adam Smith