AMI hits back at lenders over fraud risk slur

Author: Vicky Hartley
IFAonline | 23 Jun 2011 | 11:15

Categories: Mortgages

Topics: AMI| FSA| mortgage fraud

robert-sinclair-aifa

The Association of Mortgage Intermediaries (AMI) has hit back at lenders who claimed third parties, including brokers, represented some of the industry's biggest fraud risks.

Robert Sinclair, AMI director, said lenders had responsibilities of their own and pointed out their direct sales staff can also be involved in fraudulent transactions.

Earlier, lenders had flagged solicitors, brokers and surveyors as major risks in the fight against fraud. The concern appeared in the FSA's thematic review of lenders' systems and controls, published yesterday.

But Sinclair (pictured) said: "We continue to support the drive to reduce the level of fraudulent activity in the mortgage market.

"However, for mortgage fraud to be prevented all parties must be diligent, including lenders and solicitors," he said.

Sinclair said lenders should always be "diligent when reviewing their broker panels but any action taken should be appropriate and proportionate."

A mortgage adviser register is an idea AMI has always supported, and Sinclair said it would be useful for the industry to be able to identify rogue operators and stop them moving between firms.

"We are therefore disappointed that FSA has delayed the introduction of individual registration for mortgage sellers until at least 2013," he said.

In yesterday's thematic review the FSA said that, despite improvements in lenders' oversight of relationships with solicitors, there is scope for "significant improvement" in how lenders manage relationships with brokers.

It said it was concerned some lenders relied solely on a mortgage broker's entry in the FSA register to vet them.

"Checking the register can be the first step of a due diligence process but it cannot be regarded as sufficient to provide complete assurance," it said.

"Recent FSA enforcement action has shown very clearly that even FSA approved brokers do not always act with integrity or take steps to mitigate mortgage fraud risk.

"Lenders must take steps to satisfy themselves of a broker's suitability on an ongoing basis," said the regulator.

More mortgages news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

Shop the weasels

I wouldn't let a dodgy broker just walk away from my outfit; certainly, if I fired someone for cause, I'd tell the FSA about them whether or not they were an approved person - to make sure this was taken into account if they ever did become one. No reputable operator wants crooks in the industry; by helping the FSA build up their intelligence records now, that 2013 implementation date can be a brick wall to a lot of undesirables. All it takes is an email - I've fired thisi person;, this is why; here's their name, date of birth, NI number. Send it to whistle@fsa.gov.uk (my old colleagues won't thank me for that, but it's the quickest route to the right desk) and you've done your bit. "Simples".

Posted by: Adam Smith

23 Jun 2011 | 12:49
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Do you believe lenders should cut rates?

In Focus

Viewpoints