TPR to monitor 'suspicious' auto-enrolment opt outs

Author: Rachel Dalton
IFAonline | 14 Jul 2011 | 14:00

Categories: Pensions - Retail

Topics: | Steve Webb| HMRC| The Pensions Regulator| pension reform

steve-webb1

The Pensions Regulator (TPR) said it will monitor "suspiciously high" opt-out rates under auto-enrolment after MPs suggested some employers may force workers to leave the scheme.

Malcolm Wicks, Labour MP for Croydon, said TPR will have no way of knowing if employees are forced to opt out or encouraged to become self-employed.

By 2017, employers must automatically enroll their employees into a pension scheme. Employees will contribute 4%, employers 3% and there be 1% tax relief.

In a committee debate on the Pensions Bill, MPs questioned how TPR will ensure employers do not coerce staff into opting out of pensions.

Pensions minister Steve Webb (pictured) said TPR "will focus its resources on cases where opt-out rates look suspiciously high."

Webb said TPR would be able to cross reference PAYE records with auto-enrolment records to see where employees opt out.

"TPR will not be able to tell between genuine opting out and [coerced] opting out. That is where an individual who feels aggrieved will be able to report it," he said.

"We do not want to create massive burdens of reporting, but we will be reporting back to the House on the progress of auto-enrolment," he added.

Chris Evans, Labour MP for Islwyn, said: "How do we ensure companies do not encourage employees to become self-employed to avoid auto-enrolment?"

Webb said HMRC and the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) are already investigating the practice as employers already use it to avoid paying national insurance.

However, Ian Neale, director of consultancy Aries Pensions, said TPR will not be able to cope with auto-enrolment and warned this will be a "huge problem".

"Employers used to have to designate a stakeholder, but the Occupational Pensions Regulatory Authority (OPRA) did not have the resources to enforce this," he said.

"Now we have a stronger regulator, but TPR still is not going to have the resources; there is a limit to how many hours can be spent on this."

More pensions - retail news

Recommended reading

Categories

Topics

Comments

Threats not carried through

When stakeholder came in the penalty for not designating a stakeholder was supposed to be £50k. Does any adviser know of ANY firm who was hit by a penalty? I suspect NOT. Empty threats are pointless, but you only need one or two threats carried trhough and employers will wise up.

Posted by: Nameless

14 Jul 2011 | 15:43
Complain about this comment

threats

I agree nameless. Time could be better used monitoring suspicious QROP transfers. This is rife at the monent with schemes offering 80% tax free cash back and saying nothing about the likely 70% tax bill from HMRC.

Posted by: MarkG

15 Jul 2011 | 14:29
Complain about this comment

Related articles

Most Read

Audio / Visual

Coffee Lounge

View all the winners here

PPR Structured Product Awards 2011

View all the winners here

This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.

Events

event logo

International Fund & Product Awards 2012

14 Jun 2012 - 14 Jun 2012

London, UK

event logo

British Mortgage Awards 2012

03 Jul 2012 - 03 Jul 2012

London, UK

event logo

Cover Webinars

04 Jul 2012 - 04 Jul 2012

London, UK

Poll

Have you seen a decline in demand for SIPPs as a result of the proposed erosion on pension tax relief for those earning £150,000 or more?

In Focus

Viewpoints