Categories: Investment
Topics: Arch cru| FSA| coalition government| Parliament
Labour MP Russell Brown has accused the government of trying to "sweep the failures of the Financial Services Authority (FSA) under the carpet", after it refused a parliamentary debate into the regulatory oversight of those managing the failed Arch cru fund range.
The Dumfries and Galloway MP wrote to Chancellor George Osborne calling on the government to probe the FSA's role in the failure of the funds.
But an investigation was ruled out earlier this month when the Leader of the House, George Young MP, refused a Commons debate into the issue.
The decision will lead to "exactly the same thing" happening again, said Brown - effectively an Arch cru Mark II.
About £400m was invested in the fund range from 2006 until March 2009 when the FSA forced its suspension, after it became clear Arch would not be able to meet the demand for redemptions from investors seeking to sell out of their investments.
The role of the FSA in authorising the funds is under scrutiny, and Brown wants the government to investigate whether the regulator did enough to protect investors.
"These funds were misrepresented and mismanaged, but the FSA gave them a stamp of approval which meant people assumed everything had been checked out," he said in a statement.
"People were misled about what they were buying into and the blame lies with the FSA. The government needs to wake up to the problem here and learn lessons; otherwise exactly the same thing will happen again."
The FSA has proposed a £54m compensation package, which may eventually return up to 70% of investors' funds, but the offer is conditional upon investors dropping threats of legal action.
Brown has labelled the deal "a sham" and an attempt to "buy-off" investors.
"Investors right across the country are demanding answers, but rather than show some leadership and investigate the FSA's failures, the government is trying to sweep this under the carpet," Brown said.
"They have refused to even allow a debate in Parliament and are passing the buck."
| Share | |
| Comment | MP warns govt: probe FSA or face Arch cru II |
More investment news
Email alerts
Recommended reading
Categories
Topics
Comments
Oh Dear
Why is it we pay the FSA to make sure that this sort of thing doesn't happen then when it does we have to pay more into the fos to correct the fsa mistake. Surely we should get a refund of fsa fees? It's just yet another cock up in a long line of many. I wonder how they will manage to pin this on the fsa fee block for the fos as they did with Keydata.
Posted by: IFA
Deja Vu?
Surely the point is that, as far as I can ascertain, a number of firms including ourselves actually contacted the FSA as far back as 2007 and told them that Arch Cru wasn't kosher. I don't know about the other firms but we were told that as they hadn't had a complaint they wouldn't do anything. Details are available if this or any other MP wants them.
Posted by: David Cowell, Myddleton Croft
Murdoch
Whilst I am looking forward to 'Murdoch the Opera' I am not sure I can cope with 'FSA the Opera' and perhaps that will never reach the stage.
Posted by: Geoff Pollock
Related articles
Most Read
This year we have 14 awards designed to mark out the very best products in a highly competitive and innovative market. This includes three new awards for 2011 to reflect the developments in this rapidly growing market: Best Dual/Multi-Index Product, Best Structured (Oeic) Fund and Best Structured Product Provider.
Events
Poll
|
|
Job search
Ifaonlinejobs will open the right investment career path for you. Search hundreds of vacancies on www.ifaonlinejobs.co.uk now
In Focus
Rob Burdett, co-head of Thames River Multi-Capital, highlights some of the challenges facing...
Viewpoints
The darkest days of the recession following the financial crisis in late 2008 may be behind...
Arch Cru
Correct me if i'm wrong, but didnt Arch Cru fail over twelve months ago during the last governments 'watch'.
Posted by: PhilAlvey